Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Opinion — Cross River Bank v. 3 Bea's Assisted Living (4th Cir.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Opinion — Cross River Bank v. 3 Bea's Assisted Living (4th Cir.)

Summary

Unpublished opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Cross River Bank v. 3 Bea's Assisted Living LLC, No. 23-2271, argued May 8, 2025 and decided June 4, 2025, on appeal from the District of Maryland (8:21-cv-03210-TJS). Judge Heytens wrote the opinion, joined by Judge Harris and Judge Richardson. The opinion recites that Connie Stewart applied for a Paycheck Protection Program loan from Cross River Bank and signed a promissory note for one million, seven hundred six thousand, one hundred seventeen Dollars, and that the district court granted summary judgment holding Stewart personally liable. The court concludes the note is ambiguous about Stewart's personal liability under Maryland law. It vacates the judgment in part and remands for the district court to determine whether Section 3-402(b) of the Maryland Commercial Code applies.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 157 KB

Original: ca4.uscourts.gov

Record facts

File name49.pdf
SHA-2566dcbb630329b4ce484d1eda61ff8591be3215a24ac16c7440913cf488e727bc8
Size160,919 bytes
Source siteca4.uscourts.gov

File and source

File
49.pdf
Size
160,919 bytes
SHA-256
6dcbb630329b4ce484d1eda61ff8591be3215a24ac16c7440913cf488e727bc8
Our copy
49.pdf
Original
www.ca4.uscourts.gov
Back to top