Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Complaint — Calais Regional Hospital v. Carranza (Bankr. D. Me.)Search ⌕

Complaint — Calais Regional Hospital v. Carranza (Bankr. D. Me.)

Summary

An adversary complaint filed April 27, 2020 as Doc 1 in Case 20-01006 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine by Calais Regional Hospital, the Chapter 11 debtor in Case No. 19-10486, against Jovita Carranza as Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration. The complaint alleges that the hospital applied for PPP funds through First National Bank on April 7, 2020 and that the application was not processed after SBA cited the April 24 Rule barring bankruptcy debtors. Count I seeks an injunction, Count II declaratory relief, Count III relief under 11 U.S.C. § 525(a) and Count IV mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1361. It asks, among other relief, for damages not less than $1.835 million if no PPP funds remain. It is signed /s/ by Andrew C. Helman of Murray, Plumb & Murray and verified by the hospital's chief executive officer.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cited in: Jovita Carranza

Cite this document

“Complaint — Calais Regional Hospital v. Carranza (Bankr. D. Me.).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-20-01006-dkt-1-af7e60b5d9/, SHA-256 f45520dd8ebecd055a939a030c2d1f18ddb96a5d12db53db1e9d2e881ce6e0e9.

Full text

  Case 20-01006           Doc 1    Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56          Desc Main
                                     Document     Page 1 of 12



                           UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                                   DISTRICT OF MAINE


 In re:
                                                      Chapter 11
 CALAIS REGIONAL HOSPITAL,
                                                      Case No. 19-10486
                      Debtor.


 CALAIS REGIONAL HOSPITAL,

                      Plaintiff,
                                                      Adversary No. 20-______
 v.

 JOVITA CARRANZA, in her capacity as
 Administrator for the U.S. Small Business
 Administration,

                      Defendants.


                                           COMPLAINT

          Calais Regional Hospital (the “Debtor” or “CRH”), the debtor and debtor-in-possession in

the above-captioned chapter 11 case, complains against the United States Small Business

Administration (the “SBA”) acting through Jovita Carranza (the “Administrator”), in her capacity

as the Administrator of the SBA (the “Administrator”), as follows:

                                   JURISDICTION AND VENUE

          1.     This Court has jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§

157(a) and 1334(B), and the District of Maine Local Rule of Civil Procedure 83.6, pursuant to

which all cases under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) and all

proceedings arising in or related to cases arising under the Bankruptcy Code are automatically

referred to this Court.
  Case 20-01006        Doc 1      Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56          Desc Main
                                    Document     Page 2 of 12



       2.      Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409.

       3.      This matter is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

       4.      The Debtor consents to entry of final orders by this Court in this adversary

proceeding.

                                            PARTIES

       5.      The Debtor is a non-profit Maine business corporation located in Calais, Maine.

The Debtor operates a critical access hospital.

       6.      The Administrator can sue and be sued on behalf of SBA in any court of general

jurisdiction. 15 U.S.C. § 634(b).

                                    GENERAL BACKGROUND

       7.      On September 17, 2019 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtor filed a voluntary petition

under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and commenced the above-captioned chapter 11 case

now pending before this Court.

       8.      No trustee has been appointed in the Debtor’s chapter 11 case.

       9.      The Debtor continues to operate its business as a debtor-in-possession.

       10.     On March 19, 2020, the Debtor filed its Status Report Regarding Potential Case

Impact Of Covid-19 And Request For Status Conference (the “Status Report”) in its pending

chapter 11 case. The Status Report was filed at Docket Entry 301 in Case No. 19-10486. It is

incorporated by reference here.

       11.     A significant portion of the Debtor’s revenue is derived from outpatient procedures

and non-essential office visits or medical procedures. Following the issuance of recommendations

from the federal Centers for Disease Control and the State of Maine, as well as stay-at-home orders

issued by the Governor of the State of Maine, non-essential medical procedures and office visits



                                                  2
  Case 20-01006         Doc 1     Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56              Desc Main
                                    Document     Page 3 of 12



have been postponed, rescheduled or canceled. These cancellations and deferrals have had—and

are expected to continue to have—a negative impact on the Debtor’s cash receipts.

       12.     On or about March 27, 2020, Congress enacted and the President signed the

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”).

       13.     The CARES Act included stimulus funds designed to assist businesses and ensure

that American workers continue to be paid despite the economic impact of Covid-19 and social

distancing measures.

       14.     Section 1102 of the CARES Act establishes the Paycheck Protection Program

(“PPP”) as a convertible loan program under § 7(a) of the Small Business Act, codified in 15 U.S.C

§ 636. While nominally called a “loan,” PPP disbursements are treated as grants—and there are

no repayment obligations—if, among other things, 75% of PPP funds are used for payroll and

wage expenses.

       15.     A party can obtain funds under PPP by applying with any federally insured

participating lender using an application form created by SBA, and SBA guaranties the loan.

       16.     On or about April 2, 2020, SBA released forms of applications for PPP. Other than

filling out the official form of application, there is no underwriting, and the Administrator is relying

upon assistance of commercial lenders acting in concert with SBA to administer PPP.

       17.     Even though § 1102 of the CARES Act does not prohibit extending funds under

PPP to a chapter 11 debtor, the PPP application form asks whether “the Applicant . . . [is] presently

involved in any bankruptcy” and then goes on to state that answering “yes” to that question means

a request for PPP funds will not be approved.

       18.     On April 7, 2020, the Debtor submitted an application (the “Application”) for PPP

funds to its commercial lender, First National Bank. A copy of the Application is attached as



                                                   3
  Case 20-01006         Doc 1     Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56             Desc Main
                                    Document     Page 4 of 12



Exhibit A.

       19.       The Debtor sized its request for PPP funds to ensure that the funds would be treated

as a grant and be forgivable. To the extent any portion of the funds requested by the Debtor would

exceed the amount to be forgiven, the Debtor intends to immediately repay that amount.

       20.       By e-mail dated April 23, 2020, First National Bank requested guidance from SBA

with respect to processing the Debtor’s Application. A copy of this e-mail is included in the

document attached as Exhibit B.

       21.       SBA responded by e-mail dated April 24, 2020, quoting a provision of an interim

final rule promulgated that same day (the “April 24 Rule”), and not yet adopted, prohibiting

bankruptcy debtors from participating in PPP. A copy of SBA’s e-mail is included in Exhibit B.

A copy of the April 24 Rule is attached as Exhibit C.

       22.       First National Bank, through its attorney, subsequently sent an e-mail to counsel

for the Debtor stating that “[t]he bank has the original application on file and ready to be submitted.

The [b]ank is not allowed to knowingly submit an application for a Debtor in bankruptcy. So

things are on hold on our end.” A copy of First National Bank’s e-mail is included in Exhibit B.

       23.       Upon information and belief, SBA has advised Machias Savings Bank not to

process a PPP application for Penobscot Valley Hospital on the basis that PVH’s answer of “yes”

to question 1 on its PPP application was a self-certification that PVH was ineligible for PPP. A

copy of e-mail between SBA and Machias Savings Bank reflecting this discussion is attached

hereto as Exhibit D. PVH filed this document on the docket in an adversary proceeding it initiated

earlier today.

       24.       PPP funds are available on a first come, first served basis.           The Debtor’s

Application was not processed, and the Debtor did not receive funds prior to their exhaustion under



                                                  4
  Case 20-01006        Doc 1     Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56             Desc Main
                                   Document     Page 5 of 12



the first tranche of PPP funding.

          25.   Subsequently, on or about April 23, 2020, Congress enacted legislation making

additional funds available for PPP.

          26.   The Debtor is an eligible borrower under PPP and seeks to ensure adequate funds

are available under this second tranche of PPP funding once its discrimination claim under § 525(a)

of the Bankruptcy Code is resolved and the Debtor’s request for PPP funding is processed and the

deadline for any and all administrative and judicial remedies has expired.

          27.   The Debtor understands that First National Bank is willing to advance funds

through PPP if the Application (or a subsequently amended application) can be processed and

approved as meeting SBA’s requirements.

          28.   The April 24 Rule states that “[i]f the applicant or the owner of the applicant is the

debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, either at the time it submits the application or at any time before

the loan is disbursed, the applicant is ineligible to receive a PPP loan.” The stated basis for this

rule is that the Administrator “determined that providing PPP loans to debtors in bankruptcy would

present an unacceptably high risk of an unauthorized use of funds or non-repayment of unforgiven

loans.”

          29.   This interim final rule had not been proposed at the time the Debtor submitted its

Application. An interim final rule proposed on April 15, 2020 (the “April 15 Rule”) stated that

“[t]he program requirements of the PPP identified in this rule temporarily supersede any

conflicting Loan Program Requirement (as defined in 13 CFR 120.10).” The April 15 Rule

contained no exclusion for debtors.

          30.   On April 24, 2020, the Debtor filed revised cash projections (the “Cash Plan”) with

respect to a request for authority to use property that may be cash collateral. The Cash Plan is filed



                                                  5
   Case 20-01006          Doc 1   Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56             Desc Main
                                    Document     Page 6 of 12



at Docket Entry 339 in Case No. 19-10486. The Cash Plan and the related statement at Docket

Entry 339 are incorporated by reference herein.

        31.     The Debtor projects that it will run out of money to pay ongoing expenses by early

June if it is unable to obtain funds from PPP or other sources and in the absence of a widespread

outbreak of Covid-19 in Washington County. This would result in the Debtor being forced to

immediately close its business without sufficient funds for an orderly wind-down. This would

cause irreparable harm to the Debtor.

        32.     The timeline in the prior paragraph could accelerate if there is a widespread

outbreak of Covid-19 in the Debtor’s service area.

                                             COUNT I

                             (Preliminary and Permanent Injunction)

        33.     The Debtor incorporates the allegations of each of the prior paragraphs as if set

forth fully herein.

        34.     The Debtor is entitled to seek relief against the Administrator and all those acting

in concert with her under Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which is applicable to

this action pursuant to Rule 7065 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

        35.     There is no prohibition in the CARES Act or under § 7(a) of the Small Business

Act prohibiting lending to debtors.

        36.     Moreover, the CARES Act specifically waives all underwriting considerations

under § 7(a) of the Small Business Act.

        37.     The Debtor is likely to prevail on the merits of its claim for an injunction as well as

for declaratory relief.

        38.     The balance of hardships favors issuance of preliminary injunctive relief. The



                                                  6
  Case 20-01006        Doc 1     Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56             Desc Main
                                   Document     Page 7 of 12



inability to obtain PPP funds could cause the Debtor to suffer immediate and irreparable harm by

forcing the Debtor to liquidate. Preliminary and permanent injunctive relief while this matter is

pending will not harm the Defendant.

       39.      The Debtor seeks an order enjoining SBA or any commercial lender provided

notice of the Court’s order, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)(2)(C), from denying an application under

PPP on the basis that the applicant is a debtor in bankruptcy and requiring that an application of

the Debtor to participate in PPP be considered without the words “or presently involved in any

bankruptcy” being considered.

       40.      Due to the “first come, first served” nature of PPP appropriations, the Debtor further

seeks an order enjoining SBA from issuing loan guaranties or approving PPP applications in an

amount that would leave insufficient funds for the Debtor’s funding pursuant to the Application

(or any subsequent application filed shortly hereafter) until the Debtor’s claims in this Complaint

are resolved.

                                             COUNT II

                                        (Declaratory Relief)

       41.      The Debtor incorporates each of the prior paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.

       42.      The Debtor is entitled to seek declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and

Rule 7001(9) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

       43.      Neither the CARES Act nor the Small Business Act prohibit disbursements under

PPP to the Debtor based on its status as a debtor under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

       44.      The Debtor has a legal right to apply for funds under PPP and to have its

Application (or any amended application) considered on the same terms as other applicants without

regard to its status as a debtor under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.



                                                  7
  Case 20-01006          Doc 1     Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56            Desc Main
                                     Document     Page 8 of 12



       45.        By prohibiting First National Bank from processing the Application, and by

prohibiting disbursements to debtors under PPP, the Administrator has exceeded her statutory

authority.

       46.        The Debtor is entitled to a declaratory judgment that the CARES Act requires its

Application to be considered on the same terms as other qualified businesses that are not presently

debtors in cases arising under the Bankruptcy Code.

                                              COUNT III

                                          (11 U.S.C. § 525(a))

       47.        The Debtor incorporates each of the prior paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.

       48.        Section 525(a) of the Bankruptcy Code prohibits the federal government from

discriminating against a person based on that person’s status as a debtor with respect to a “license,

permit, charter, franchise, or other similar grant[.]”

       49.        The Debtor is a debtor in a case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

       50.        PPP constitutes a federal program within the meaning of § 525(a) of the Bankruptcy

Code in that the program is designed to provide forgivable loans to qualified businesses that are

akin to grants.

       51.        The Debtor is a small business within the meaning of the CARES Act and is eligible

to participate in funding of forgivable loans, which are functionally grants, under PPP.

       52.        The Debtor has, in fact, sized its PPP funding request to be forgivable and, to the

extent any funds would not qualify for forgiveness, intends to immediately repay (and there is no

prepayment penalty under PPP).

       53.        The e-mail attached hereto as Exhibit B and Exhibit D, the bankruptcy-related

question on the Application, and the April 24 Rule demonstrate that SBA has violated § 525(a) of



                                                    8
  Case 20-01006        Doc 1    Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56            Desc Main
                                  Document     Page 9 of 12



the Bankruptcy Code with respect to the Debtor.

       54.     SBA has violated § 525(a) of the Bankruptcy Code for the reasons stated in this

Complaint.

                                           COUNT IV

                                (Mandamus – 28 U.S.C. § 1361)

       55.     The Debtor incorporates each of the prior paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.

       56.     The Administrator has a duty to implement the laws enacted by Congress. This

non-discretionary duty includes implementing PPP in a manner that does not violate § 525(a) of

the Bankruptcy Code.

       57.     The Administrator breached this duty.

       58.     The Debtor has the right to have an application for funds pursuant to PPP

considered without discrimination based on the Debtor’s status as a bankruptcy debtor.

       59.     The Administrator has no discretion to discriminate against the Debtor based on its

status as a debtor in bankruptcy.

       60.     Upon information and belief, there are no administrative remedies available to the

Debtor at this time. The Debtor has based this belief upon communications with First National

Bank in which the Debtor requested that a waiver of the SBA requirements be sought and

subsequent communication from First National Bank that it is not currently able to process the

Application due to the Debtor’s status as a debtor. The Debtor further bases this belief on the

allegation of Penobscot Valley Hospital in a complaint filed earlier today (AP-20-1005) that it has

a similar belief and that such belief is based on communications between Congressional staff and

SBA.




                                                 9
Case 20-01006     Doc 1    Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56           Desc Main
                            Document     Page 10 of 12



                               RELIEF REQUESTED

   With respect to Count I, the Debtor seeks the following relief:

   (A)    A preliminary injunction enjoining SBA or any commercial lender from denying

          an application under PPP on the basis that the applicant is a debtor in bankruptcy

          or because of the words “or presently in bankruptcy” on the Administrator’s PPP

          application. The Debtor requests that this relief be granted under such time as a

          final judgment is entered on its claims in Count II, Count III, and Count IV;

   (B)    A preliminary injunction enjoining SBA from issuing loan guaranties or approving

          PPP applications in an amount that would leave insufficient funds for the Debtor’s

          funding pursuant to the Application (or any amended application) until entry of

          final judgment on the Debtor’s Claims in Count II, Count III, and Count IV; and

   (C)    Permanent injunctive relief with respect to the relief in the two immediately

          preceding sub-paragraphs.

   With respect to Count II, the Debtor seeks the following relief:

   (A)    That the Court enter a declaratory judgment that the CARES Act does not prohibit

          the Application from being considered on the same terms as other qualified

          business that are not debtors in cases arising under the Bankruptcy Code and which

          are also seeking PPP funding.

   With respect to Count III, the Debtor seeks the following relief:

   (A)    A determination that SBA has violated § 525(a) of the Bankruptcy Code with

          respect to the Debtor’s Application; and

   (B)    A determination that SBA has violated § 525(a) of the Bankruptcy Code by issuing

          its interim final rule on April 24, 2020, and promulgating a PPP application form



                                           10
  Case 20-01006        Doc 1   Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56            Desc Main
                                Document     Page 11 of 12



              excluding debtors.

       (C)    Damages in an amount not less than $1.4 million the event that the Court does not

              grant the relief requested in Count I on a temporary or preliminary basis and it is

              later determined that the Debtor was eligible for PPP funds but none remain

              available.

       With respect to Count IV, the Debtor seeks the following relief:

       (A)    Entry of judgment directing the Administrator to process any application of the

              Debtor under PPP without discriminating against the Debtor based on its status as

              a debtor in bankruptcy.

       (B)    Damages in an amount not less than $1.835 million the event that the Court does

              not grant the relief requested in Count I on a temporary or preliminary basis and it

              is later determined that the Debtor was eligible for PPP funds but none remain

              available.

       With respect to Count I, Count II, Count III, and Count IV, the Debtor requests that it be

awarded attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2412(b).



Date: April 27, 2020                        /s/ Andrew C. Helman
                                            Andrew C. Helman
                                            Kelly W. McDonald
                                            Katie M. Krakowka
                                            Sage Friedman
                                            MURRAY, PLUMB & MURRAY
                                            75 Pearl Street, P.O. Box 9785
                                            Portland, Maine 04104-5085
                                            (207) 773-5651

                                            Attorneys For Calais Regional Hospital




                                               11
  Case 20-01006         Doc 1     Filed 04/27/20 Entered 04/27/20 15:24:56              Desc Main
                                   Document     Page 12 of 12




                                         VERIFICATION

       I, Rod Boula, am the chief executive officer of Calais Regional Hospital and declare under

penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the allegations in paragraphs

5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, and 60 of the

foregoing Complaint are true and accurate, to the best of my knowledge and belief, and, if not

based on my own personal knowledge, that I believe such allegations to be true and correct.


Date: April 27, 2020                           /s/ Rod Boula




                                                  12


File and source

File
1-adversary-case-20-01006-complaint-by-calais-regional-hospita.pdf
Size
450,278 bytes
SHA-256
f45520dd8ebecd055a939a030c2d1f18ddb96a5d12db53db1e9d2e881ce6e0e9
Our copy
1-adversary-case-20-01006-complaint-by-calais-regional-hospita.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top