Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order — United States v. Jackson Hamilton Roberts (Document 9)

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order — United States v. Jackson Hamilton Roberts (Document 9)

Summary

This is findings of fact, conclusions of law and an order in the District of Nevada, Case No. 2:25-mj-00258-EJY, United States of America against Jackson Hamilton Roberts. Based on a stipulation, the Court finds the parties are still in negotiations and more time is needed for defense counsel to confer with the client about a potential agreement with the government. It also finds the defendant is out of custody and does not oppose, and that the time is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A). It states this is the second request for a continuance of the bench trial. The order vacates the bench trial currently scheduled for 9:30 a.m. and continues it to February 4, 2026 at 9:30 a.m.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order — United States v. Jackson Hamilton Roberts (Document 9).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-25-mj-00258-dkt-9-a29bf2c5fd/, SHA-256 c5684340618190905caa1e34a3539df6242d64385cb7837f66e5865cdd173d0f.

Full text

          Case 2:25-mj-00258-EJY           Document 9        Filed 10/16/25      Page 1 of 2




 1                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 2                                      DISTRICT OF NEVADA

 3
     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                               Case No. 2:25-mj-00258-EJY
 4
                    Plaintiff,
 5                                                           FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
            v.                                               OF LAW AND ORDER
 6
     JACKSON HAMILTON ROBERTS,
 7
                    Defendant.
 8
 9
                                          FINDINGS OF FACT
10
11          Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the

12   Court finds that:

13          1.      The parties are still in negotiations and additional time is needed for defense

14   counsel to confer with her client about a potential agreement with the government.

15          1.      The defendant is out of custody and does not oppose the continuance.

16          2.      Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a

17   miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in

18   computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial

19   Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title

20   18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

21          This is the second request for a continuance of the bench trial.
                                       CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
22
23          The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the

24   public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be

25   likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the

26
                                                       3
          Case 2:25-mj-00258-EJY          Document 9       Filed 10/16/25      Page 2 of 2




 1   opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into
 2   account the exercise of due diligence.
 3          The continuance sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18,
 4   United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), when the considering the facts under Title 18,
 5   United States Code, § 316(h)(7)(B)(iv).
 6                                              ORDER

 7          IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the bench trial currently scheduled on October 22,
 8   2025, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and continued to February 4, 2026 at the hour of
 9   9:30 a.m.
10          DATED this 16th day of October 2025.
11
12                                                UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
                                                     4

File and source

File
9.pdf
Size
173,356 bytes
SHA-256
c5684340618190905caa1e34a3539df6242d64385cb7837f66e5865cdd173d0f
Our copy
9.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top