Detention Order — United States v. Klint Massey (Eastern District of California, Document 8)
Summary
This is a Detention Order (Violation of Pretrial Release, Probation or Supervised Release) in the Eastern District of California, No. 2:25-cr-00136-DC, concerning defendant Klint Massey, filed July 21, 2025. The marked section is the one for violation of probation or supervised release: the court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated a condition of probation or supervised release and that the defendant has not met the burden of showing by clear and convincing evidence that there will be no flight or danger. Under the order the defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General and must be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel. Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim's name is printed at the end.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Detention Order — United States v. Klint Massey (Eastern District of California, Document 8).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-25-cr-00136-dkt-8-e-d-cal-274875e2d5/
, SHA-256 ba9fb5e51e5de9ec0ee2748c21ddf7f2b7c979322f69432c5a06a93e4c8d192f.Full text
Case 2:25-cr-00136-DC Document 8 Filed 07/21/25 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FILED
July 21, 2025
CLERK, US DSITRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:25-cr-00136-DC
Plaintiff, DETENTION ORDER
(Violation of Pretrial Release,
v. Probation or Supervised Release)
KLINT MASSEY
Defendant.
After a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (violation of pretrial release order), the court finds :
there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a federal, state or local crime while
on
release and defendant has not rebutted the presumption that his release will endanger another or
the community or
there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated another condition of
release
and
based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) there is no condition or combination of
conditions of release that will assure that the defendant will not flee or pose a danger to the safety
of another person or the community or
the person is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release. F.R.Cr.P.
32.1(a)(D), 46(c), 18 U.S.C. § 3148.
x After a hearing pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 32.1(a)(6) and 46(c) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (violation of probation or
supervised release) the court finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has violated a condition
of
probation or supervised release and the defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and
convincing evidence that he will not flee or pose a danger to another person or to the community.
18 U.S.C. § 3143.
IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4) defendant is committed to the custody of the
Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons
awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded
reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his counsel. Upon further order of a court of the United
States or request of an attorney for the United States the person in charge of the corrections facility in which
the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for purpose of an appearance
in connection with a court proceeding.
DATE: 7/21/2025 _______________________________________
Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim
File and source
- File
- 8.pdf
- Size
- 118,676 bytes
- SHA-256
- ba9fb5e51e5de9ec0ee2748c21ddf7f2b7c979322f69432c5a06a93e4c8d192f
- Our copy
- 8.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.