Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Court filing — No. 2:25-cr-00038 (Dkt. 47, E.D. Cal.)

Court filing — No. 2:25-cr-00038 (Dkt. 47, E.D. Cal.)

Full text

     Case 2:25-cr-00038-DJC          Document 47        Filed 03/02/26      Page 1 of 3


1    Jennifer J Wirsching, SBN 263141
2    2600 West Olive Ave. 5th floor Burbank, CA 91505
3    wirschinglaw@outlook.com
4    424-901-9280
5    Attorney for Defendant
     AKASH SINGH
6
7
                              IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
                           FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                   )   Case No. 2:25-CR-0038-DJC
                                                 )
11   Plaintiff,                                  )   STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
                                                 )   STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE
12   vs.                                         )   TIME
                                                 )
13   AKASH SINGH,                                )    Date: March 12, 2026
                                                 )    Time: 9:00 a.m.
14   Defendant.                                  )    Judge: Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta
                                                 )
15                                               )
16                IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between United States
17     Attorney Eric Grant, through Assistant United States Attorney Samuel Stefanki, counsel for

18   Plaintiff, and Jennifer J Wirsching attorney for Akash Singh, that the status conference, currently

19                scheduled for March 12, 2026, be continued to May 14, 2026 at 9:00 a.m.

20          Defense counsel requests additional time as defense counsel has just substituted in, and

21   has yet to receive discovery in this matter. Counsel will need to review discovery and conduct

22   investigation in this case. The parties believe a continuance to May 14, 2026 will permit defense

23   counsel the additional time necessary to conduct pretrial investigation, identify and interview

24   witnesses, obtain pertinent records, and finalize any further pre-plea negotiations.

25          Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be

26   excluded of this order’s date through and including May 14, 2026; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161
     (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4
27
     based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.
28

                                                      -1-
     Case 2:25-cr-00038-DJC          Document 47        Filed 03/02/26       Page 2 of 3


1           Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting
2    this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
3
4                                                  Respectfully submitted,
5
     Dated: March 2, 2026
6                                                  /s/ Jennifer Wirsching
                                                   Jennifer J. Wirsching
7                                                  Attorney for Defendant
8
9                                                  MICHELLE BECKWITH
                                                   United States Attorney
10
                                                   /s/ Samuel Stefanki
11   Dated: March 2, 2026
                                                   SAMUEL STEFANKI
12                                                 Assistant U.S. Attorney
                                                   Attorney for Plaintiff
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

                                                     -2-
     Case 2:25-cr-00038-DJC           Document 47        Filed 03/02/26      Page 3 of 3


1                                                  ORDER
2           IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties’
3    stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties’ stipulation in its entirety as
4    its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny
5    counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of
6    due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested
7    continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.
8           The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including May
9    14, 2026 shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be
10   commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv)
11   [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further
12   ordered the March 12, 2026 status conference shall be continued until May 14, 2026, at 9:00
13   a.m.
14   Dated: March 2, 2026                                   ________________________________
                                                            HON. DANIEL J. CALABRETTA
15                                                          United States District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

                                                      -3-


File and source

File
47.pdf
Size
214,818 bytes
SHA-256
572d60596940776617b0c0dc794fca093c1881e4572d511035284f8db490da4b
Our copy
47.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top