Notice to Court of Related Criminal Case — United States v. Jasmine Mallard McCarter (Document 7)
Summary
A Notice to Court of Defendant(s) Related Criminal Case (pursuant to General Order 224 as amended by General Order 98-04), filed January 15, 2025 as Document 7 in United States of America v. Jasmine Mallard McCarter, CR No. 2:25-CR-00026, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Plaintiff United States of America informs the Court that the case may be related to U.S. v. Lavinnciea Rose Nelson, 2:24-CR-692-MEMF. The form lists grounds for relatedness, including that the cases arise out of the same conspiracy, common scheme, transaction, series of transactions or events. It is dated January 15, 2025, followed by the name Andrew Brown, Assistant United States Attorney.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Notice to Court of Related Criminal Case — United States v. Jasmine Mallard McCarter (Document 7).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-25-cr-00026-dkt-7-c-d-cal-4ed3e13579/
, SHA-256 0dfd04d8b0dcfea32ef20b73254f1b1f52f7aeb64f96288c4cf5f79d833d046d.Full text
Case 2:25-cr-00026-MEMF Document 7 Filed 01/15/25 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:15
JAN 15 2025
rsm
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NUMBER
PLAINTIFF
CR No. 2:25-CR-00026-MWF
v.
JASMINE MALLARD MCCARTER,
NOTICE TO COURT OF
DEFENDANT(S) RELATED CRIMINAL CASE
(PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 AS
AMENDED BY GENERAL ORDER 98-04)
Plaintiff United States of America hereby informs the Court that the above-entitled
criminal case may be related to U.S. v. Lavinnciea Rose Nelson, 2:24-CR-692-MEMF, which:
X was previously assigned to the Honorable Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong.
has not been previously assigned.
The above-entitled cases may be related for the following reasons:
X the cases arise out of the same conspiracy, common scheme, transaction,
series of transactions or events;
the cases involve one or more defendants in common and would entail
substantial duplication of labor in pretrial, trial or sentencing proceedings if
heard by different judges.
Additional explanation (if any):
Dated: January 15, 2025
Andrew Brown
Assistant United States Attorney
File and source
- File
- 7.pdf
- Size
- 222,706 bytes
- SHA-256
- 0dfd04d8b0dcfea32ef20b73254f1b1f52f7aeb64f96288c4cf5f79d833d046d
- Our copy
- 7.pdf
- Original
- archive.org