Detention Order — United States v. Klint Massey (Eastern District of California, Document 4)
Summary
This is a Detention Order (Violation of Pretrial Release, Probation or Supervised Release) in the Eastern District of California, No. 2:24-mj-00116-CSK, concerning defendant Klint Massey, with a filing stamp of September 30, 2024. Only the marked section on violation of probation or supervised release applies, and it states the court finds probable cause to believe the defendant has violated a condition of probation or supervised release and that the defendant has not met the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that no flight or danger will result. The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate from persons awaiting or serving sentences. The order ends with the printed name of Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Detention Order — United States v. Klint Massey (Eastern District of California, Document 4).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-24-mj-00116-dkt-4-e-d-cal-98420a24b1/
, SHA-256 843200216a6c187d905512e349f8ea8c85913a8364ae324499652df6cd5e66b7.Full text
Case 2:24-mj-00116-CSK Document 4 Filed 09/30/24 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FILED
September 30, 2024
CLERK, US DSITRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:24-mj-00116-CSK
Plaintiff,
v. DETENTION ORDER
(Violation of Pretrial Release,
KLINT MASSEY Probation or Supervised Release)
Defendant.
After a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (violation of pretrial release order), the court finds :
there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a federal, state or local crime while
on
release and defendant has not rebutted the presumption that his release will endanger another or
the community or
there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated another condition of
release
and
based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) there is no condition or combination of
conditions of release that will assure that the defendant will not flee or pose a danger to the safety
of another person or the community or
the person is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release. F.R.Cr.P.
32.1(a)(D), 46(c), 18 U.S.C. § 3148.
x After a hearing pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 32.1(a)(6) and 46(c) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (violation of probation or
supervised release) the court finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has violated a condition
of
probation or supervised release and the defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and
convincing evidence that he will not flee or pose a danger to another person or to the community.
18 U.S.C. § 3143.
IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4) defendant is committed to the custody of the
Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons
awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded
reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his counsel. Upon further order of a court of the United
States or request of an attorney for the United States the person in charge of the corrections facility in which
the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for purpose of an appearance
in connection with a court proceeding.
DATE: 9/30/2024 _______________________________________
Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim
File and source
- File
- 4.pdf
- Size
- 119,420 bytes
- SHA-256
- 843200216a6c187d905512e349f8ea8c85913a8364ae324499652df6cd5e66b7
- Our copy
- 4.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.