Detention Order, Violation of Pretrial Release, Probation or Supervised Release — Stacy Marie Smith
Summary
This is a Detention Order for violation of pretrial release, probation or supervised release in the Eastern District of California, No. 2:23-mj-00144-KJN, for defendant Stacy Marie Smith, dated November 13, 2023. The marked findings say a hearing took place on a violation of a pretrial release order, that there is clear and convincing evidence the defendant violated another condition of release, and that no condition or combination of conditions will assure the defendant will not flee or pose a danger. The order commits the defendant to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate from persons awaiting or serving sentences.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Detention Order, Violation of Pretrial Release, Probation or Supervised Release — Stacy Marie Smith.”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-23-mj-00144-dkt-4-e-d-cal-7c4af9e140/
, SHA-256 1672ed628d95ef7841f776c4c9a0e042b2d3da940497f642e1f8af52111a5fff.Full text
Case 2:23-mj-00144-KJN Document 4 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FILED
November 13, 2023
CLERK, US DSITRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No 2:23-mj-00144-KJN
Plaintiff,
v. DETENTION ORDER
(Violation of Pretrial Release,
STACY MARIE SMITH Probation or Supervised Release)
Defendant.
X After a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (violation of pretrial release order), the court finds :
there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a federal, state or local crime while on
release and defendant has not rebutted the presumption that his release will endanger another or
the community or
X there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated another condition of release
and
X based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) there is no condition or combination of
conditions of release that will assure that the defendant will not flee or pose a danger to the safety
of another person or the community or
the person is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release. F.R.Cr.P.
32.1(a)(D), 46(c), 18 U.S.C. § 3148.
After a hearing pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 32.1(a)(6) and 46(c) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (violation of probation or
supervised release) the court finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has violated a condition of
probation or supervised release and the defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and
convincing evidence that he will not flee or pose a danger to another person or to the community.
18 U.S.C. § 3143.
IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4) defendant is committed to the custody of the
Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons
awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded
reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his counsel. Upon further order of a court of the United
States or request of an attorney for the United States the person in charge of the corrections facility in which
the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for purpose of an appearance
in connection with a court proceeding.
Dated: November 13, 2023
File and source
- File
- 4.pdf
- Size
- 97,272 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1672ed628d95ef7841f776c4c9a0e042b2d3da940497f642e1f8af52111a5fff
- Our copy
- 4.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.