Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Memorandum Opinion — U.S. v. Danielle A. Phillips (N.D. Ala.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Memorandum Opinion — U.S. v. Danielle A. Phillips (N.D. Ala.)

Summary

A memorandum opinion regarding sentencing in United States of America v. Danielle A. Phillips, Case No. 2:23-CR-00332-MHH-JHE2, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, filed May 16, 2025 as Document 123 by United States District Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala. It explains why the court overruled the government's objection, made at the February 20, 2025 sentencing hearing, to hearing Phillips's objections to the presentence report released June 13, 2024. The opinion recounts a November 21, 2023 guilty plea to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and a June 2024 revision, after untimely government objections, that added an obstruction enhancement and raised the guideline range from 30 to 37 months to 51 to 63 months. It finds good cause because CJA counsel Scott Brower had not received the June 2024 report.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 259 KB

Original: govinfo.gov

Record facts

File name123.pdf
SHA-25619e0875e0054aa14b86e83cc295e81e79e0d0f110cd4e6f24412ecd9c1ebf7f0
Size264,918 bytes
Source sitegovinfo.gov

File and source

File
123.pdf
Size
264,918 bytes
SHA-256
19e0875e0054aa14b86e83cc295e81e79e0d0f110cd4e6f24412ecd9c1ebf7f0
Our copy
123.pdf
Original
www.govinfo.gov
Back to top