Memorandum Opinion and Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Garza, 2:22-MJ-00359-001
Summary
A Memorandum Opinion and Order of Detention Pending Trial in United States of America v. Richard Garza, Action No. 2:22-MJ-00359-001, Document 8, filed 04/01/22, in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas. The defendant is charged under 21 U.S.C. § 841 with conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute, which the order calls a "presumption" offense. The court finds that the defendant has not rebutted the presumption, citing a significant risk of nonappearance based on property in Mexico and recent travel there, and a risk of danger to the community, including a 2016 conviction for transporting undocumented aliens. It commits the defendant to the custody of the United States Marshal; the signature block names Mitchel Neurock, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Memorandum Opinion and Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Garza, 2:22-MJ-00359-001.”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-22-mj-00359-dkt-8-b5981fcba3/
, SHA-256 5d3ae1e80bfefd8e235e3769b8cdbd13f7998df2ed8a27deb66d50c020cc9eb6.Full text
Case 2:22-mj-00359 Document 8 Filed on 04/01/22 in TXSD Page 1 of 3
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
April 01, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §
§
v. § ACTION NO. 2:22-MJ-00359-001
§
RICHARD GARZA §
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
A detention hearing was held today in accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18
U.S.C. § 3142(f). The Court entertained oral argument from the Government and counsel
for Defendant Richard Garza. Defendant is charged pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841 for
conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute. This offense is a
“presumption” offense, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), and as such, the following requires
detention of Defendant pending trial:
(1) There is probable cause to believe Defendant has committed an
offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is
prescribed in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A); and
(2) Defendant has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or
combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of Defendant as
required and the safety of the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(A).
In addition to finding probable cause in this case, Defendant has failed to rebut the
presumption that he remain detained pending trial. The Court adopts the factual findings
contained in the pretrial services report. The Court finds that Defendant poses a
1/3
Case 2:22-mj-00359 Document 8 Filed on 04/01/22 in TXSD Page 2 of 3
significant risk of nonappearance in this case. Defendant has significant ties to a foreign
country, as evidenced by the fact he owns property in Mexico and has traveled there as
recently as a month before his arrest in the instant offense. Defendant resides in the Rio
Grande Valley, a location in close proximity to the international border, and appears to
possess resources sufficient to enable his unauthorized departure from the United States
to escape prosecution. These facts signal a risk of Defendant absconding to Mexico or
elsewhere in the United States.
The Court also finds by at least clear and convincing evidence that Defendant’s
release on bond would pose a significant risk of danger to the community. Defendant has
been charged in the instant offense with a serious crime that carries a minimum of ten
years’ imprisonment. Additionally, Defendant has an extensive criminal history, and,
although most of this criminal activity occurred in the more distant past, Defendant was
convicted in 2016 in this district for transporting undocumented aliens, a crime for which
he received a significant prison sentence.
For these reasons, the Court finds that Defendant is a poor candidate for bond, and
that Defendant has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or set of conditions
would adequately assure Defendant’s presence at trial and adequately assure the safety of
any other person or the community.
Defendant is committed to the custody of the United States Marshal or
designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the
extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody
2/3
Case 2:22-mj-00359 Document 8 Filed on 04/01/22 in TXSD Page 3 of 3
pending appeal. Defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private
consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on
request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections
facility shall deliver Defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an
appearance in connection with a court proceeding.
SIGNED on April 1, 2022.
_____________________________
MITCHEL NEUROCK
United States Magistrate Judge
3/3
File and source
- File
- 8.pdf
- Size
- 104,788 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5d3ae1e80bfefd8e235e3769b8cdbd13f7998df2ed8a27deb66d50c020cc9eb6
- Our copy
- 8.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.