Complaint — GNGH2 v. Hemisphere GNSS (D. Ariz.)

Summary

A sealed qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act in United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. v. Hemisphere GNSS (USA) Inc., Case 2:22-cv-00224-MTL, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, filed February 10, 2022 as Document 1. The relator alleges that the defendant, a Scottsdale, Arizona technology firm, falsely certified on Form 2483-SD on or about February 13, 2021 that it was not owned or directed from the People’s Republic of China when applying for second-round PPP funding. It alleges the defendant was a subsidiary of Beijing Unistrong Science & Technology Co. Ltd. and had a director resident in Mainland China. The complaint lists loans of $1,671,500 and $1,570,200 and seeks judgment of $4,710,600 under 31 U.S.C. Section 3729. It is filed by David Abrams, Attorney at Law, for the relator.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used