Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Government's Motion for Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Davis (Document 19)

Government's Motion for Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Davis (Document 19)

Summary

Government's Motion for Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, Document 19, filed May 24, 2023 in United States of America v. Darquis Davis, Criminal No. 22-347, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The motion states that the defendant was charged by Information with conspiracy to deal firearms without a license under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and pleaded guilty to Count One on November 8, 2022. It asks for forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) of one Ruger, Model Security 9, 9mm semi-automatic pistol. It includes a proposed order with a signature line for Harvey Bartle, III, and a certificate of service dated May 24, 2023.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Government's Motion for Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Davis (Document 19).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-22-cr-00347-dkt-19-e-d-pa-84c678e4e5/, SHA-256 e016b3dffaee37cc72e1e689f4440b62019528b1474ccccf6c0fb31348138be0.

Full text

           Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 1 of 9




                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                     FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                           :
                                                   :
                v.                                 :           CRIMINAL NO. 22-347
                                                   :
DARQUIS DAVIS                                      :
    a/k/a “Justice”                                :           FILED UNDER SEAL

                     GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AND
                        PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

                The United States of America, by and through its attorneys, Jacqueline C.

Romero, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Sarah L. Grieb,

Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Asset Recovery and Financial Litigation Unit, J.

Jeanette Kang, Assistant United States Attorney, and Alexander B. Bowerman, Special Assistant

United States Attorney, respectfully requests entry of a Judgment and Preliminary Order of

Forfeiture, and, in support of this motion, the United States represents as follows:

                1.      On October 3, 2021, Darquis Davis was charged in an Information with

conspiracy to deal firearms without a license, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Count One).

                2.      The Information also contained a Notice of Forfeiture. The Notice of

Forfeiture alleged that the defendant shall forfeit certain property, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)

and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), as a result of her violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Count One).

                3.      The defendant entered into a Guilty Plea Agreement whereby she agreed,

inter alia, to plead guilty to Count One of the Information. The defendant further agreed not to

contest forfeiture as set forth in the Notice of Forfeiture.
             Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 2 of 9




                  4.       The defendant has also agreed, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4),

that this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall become final as to the defendant prior to her

sentencing.

                  5.       On November 8, 2022, the defendant pleaded guilty at her plea hearing to

Count One of the Information.

                  6.       As a result of her guilty plea, the defendant is required, pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), to forfeit criminally the firearms and ammunition

involved in or used in the violation charged in Count One of the Information.

                  7.        Based on the facts set forth at the defendant’s plea hearing, those set forth

in the Guilty Plea Agreement, and those set forth in the record as a whole, the government avers

that the following specific property 1 is subject to forfeiture as a result of the defendant’s guilty

plea to the illegal act alleged in Count One of the Information, and that the government has

established the requisite nexus between such property and such offense:

                  a.       One (1) Ruger, Model Security 9, 9mm semi-automatic pistol, bearing

                           serial number 383-61872,

as a firearm involved in or used in the violation of the aforesaid offense alleged in Count One

(hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”).

                  8.       Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(1)(A), “[a]s soon as practical after a

verdict or finding of guilty, or after a plea of guilty or nolo contender is accepted … the court

must determine what property is subject to forfeiture under the applicable statute.” Fed. R. Crim.

P. 32.2(b)(1)(A). When the government seeks forfeiture of specific property, “the court must


1
  The government seeks to forfeit an additional fifty-six (56) firearms which are listed in the Notice of Forfeiture of
the Indictment. As of now, the remaining fifty-six (56) firearms are not in law enforcement custody. The
government intends to amend this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as the remaining firearms are taken into custody.

                                                         -2-
           Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 3 of 9




determine whether the government has established the requisite nexus between the property and

the offense;” when the government seeks a forfeiture money judgement, “the court must

determine the amount of the money that the defendant will be ordered to pay”. Id. The Court’s

determination may be based on “evidence already in the record … and on any additional

evidence or information submitted by the parties and accepted by the court as relevant and

reliable.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(1)(B). “Unless doing so is impractical, the court must enter

the preliminary order sufficiently in advance of sentencing to allow the parties to suggest

revisions or modifications before the order becomes final as to the defendant under Rule

32.2(b)(4).” Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(B). The preliminary order of forfeiture becomes final as

to the defendant at sentencing, or earlier if the defendant consents. Fed. R. Crim. P.

32.2(b)(4)(A).

                 9.    Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(2)(B), for the reasons stated above, the

government requests that this Court enter the attached Judgment and Preliminary Order of

Forfeiture. The government further requests that it be permitted, in its discretion, to serve the

Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture directly on the defendant, or if the defendant is

represented, upon the defendant’s counsel, and on any person known to have an interest in the

Subject Property.

                 10.   The government requests authority to conduct discovery, in accordance

with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3) and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m), to identify, locate, and dispose of

property subject to forfeiture and to address any third-party claims.

                 11.   The government requests authority to seize the Subject Property described

above, if not already in the government=s custody or subject to a restraining order, if necessary to

protect the interests of the United States in the property, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(g).

                                                -3-
          Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 4 of 9




               12.     The government requests authority to undertake publication of the

forfeiture order, once the government seizes the specific property identified in Paragraph 7

above, and notify potential third-party claimants, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3), (b)(6)

and (c)(1)(B) and 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1).

               For the reasons stated above, the government requests that this Court enter the

attached Order.

                                                     Respectfully submitted,

                                                     JACQUELINE C. ROMERO
                                                     United States Attorney

                                                     /s/ Sarah L. Grieb
                                                     SARAH L. GRIEB
                                                     Assistant United States Attorney
                                                     Chief, Asset Recovery and Financial
                                                     Litigation


                                                     /s/ Alexander B. Bowerman
                                                     ALEXANDER B. BOWERMAN
                                                     Special Assistant United States Attorney
                                                     J. JEANETTE KANG
                                                     Assistant United States Attorney

Date:   May 24, 2023




                                               -4-
           Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 5 of 9




                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                          :
                                                  :
               v.                                 :            CRIMINAL NO. 22-347
                                                  :
DARQUIS DAVIS                                     :
    a/k/a “Justice”                               :            FILED UNDER SEAL


                                   ORDER OF FORFEITURE

               IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

               1.      As a result of defendant Darquis Davis’s guilty plea as to Count One of

the Information, charging her with conspiracy to dealing firearms without a license, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Count One), the defendant is required to forfeit criminally any firearms and

ammunition involved in or used in such violation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C.

2461(c).

               2.      All firearms and ammunition involved in or used in the defendant’s

violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371 are forfeited to the United States.

               3.      The Court has determined, based on the facts set forth at the plea hearing,

those set forth in the Guilty Plea Agreement, and those set forth in the record as a whole, that the

following specific property is subject to forfeiture as a result of the defendant’s guilty plea to the

illegal act alleged in Count One of the Information, that the government has established the

requisite nexus between such property and such offense, and that the following property is

forfeited to the United States:

               a.      One (1) Ruger, Model Security 9, 9mm semi-automatic pistol, bearing

                       serial number 383-61872,
           Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 6 of 9




as a firearm involved in or used in the violation of the aforesaid offense alleged in Count One

(hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”).

               4.      Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4), the Preliminary Order of

Forfeiture may be made final as to the defendant, prior to her sentencing and shall be made part

of the sentence and included in the judgment. See United States v. Bennett, 423 F.3d. 271 (3d

Cir. 2005) (to be effective, a forfeiture order must be included in sentence and judgment).

               5.      Upon entry of this Order, the Attorney General or a designee is authorized

to seize any specific property subject to forfeiture that is identified in this Order, pursuant to Fed.

R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3).

               6.      Upon entry of this Order, the Attorney General or a designee, pursuant to

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3) and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m), is authorized to conduct any discovery to

identify, locate, and dispose of property subject to this Order and to address any third-party

claims, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and

subpoenas pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.

               7.      Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1), and Rule G(4) of the Supplemental

Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, made applicable pursuant

to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(6)(c), the United States Government shall put notice on an official

internet government forfeiture site (www.forfeiture.gov) for 30 consecutive days, notice of the

government’s intent to dispose of the Subject Property in such manner as the Attorney General

may direct, and notice that any person, other than the defendant, having or claiming a legal

interest in any of the property subject to this Order must file a petition with the Court within

thirty (30) days of the final publication of notice or of receipt of actual notice, whichever is

earlier.


                                                 -2-
            Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 7 of 9




                This notice shall state that the petition shall be for a hearing to adjudicate the

validity of the petitioner’s alleged interest in the Subject Property, shall be signed by the

petitioner under penalty of perjury, and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner’s

right, title or interest in each of the forfeited properties and any additional facts supporting the

petitioner’s claim, and the relief sought.

                8.      The United States shall also, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1), to the

extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have alleged an interest

in the property that is subject to the Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, and to their

attorney, if they are represented, as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so

notified.

                9.      Any person, other than the defendant, asserting a legal interest in the

Subject Property may, within thirty days of the final publication of notice or receipt of notice,

whichever is earlier, petition the Court for a hearing without a jury to adjudicate the validity of

his alleged interest in the Subject Property, and for an amendment of the order of forfeiture,

pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6).

                10.     Following the disposition of any motion filed under Fed. R. Crim. P.

32.2(c)(1)(A) and before a hearing on the petition, discovery may be conducted in accordance

with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure upon showing that such discovery is necessary or

desirable to resolve factual issues.

                11.     The United States shall have clear title to the Subject Property following

the Court’s disposition of all third-party interests.

                12.     The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as

necessary, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e).


                                                 -3-
          Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 8 of 9




              13.     The Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania shall deliver a copy of this Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to the

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”), and to counsel for the parties.



                      ORDERED this ___ day of _____________________, 2023.



                                      ____________________________________________
                                      HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III
                                      Senior Judge, United States District Court




                                              -4-
          Case 2:22-cr-00347-HB Document 19 Filed 05/24/23 Page 9 of 9




                               CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

              I certify that a copy of the Government’s Motion for Order of Forfeiture and

proposed Forfeiture Order have been served upon counsel for the defendant by electronic mail,

as follows:



                        Mariana Rossman, Esquire
                             The Rossman Firm
                             1500 Walnut Street
                                7th Floor West
                          Philadelphia, PA 19102
                                215-913-6280
                      mrossman@therossmanfirm.com
                     Counsel for defendant Darquis Davis




                                            /s/ Alexander B. Bowerman
                                            Alexander B. Bowerman
                                            Special Assistant United States Attorney


Date: May 24, 2023


File and source

File
19.pdf
Size
186,230 bytes
SHA-256
e016b3dffaee37cc72e1e689f4440b62019528b1474ccccf6c0fb31348138be0
Our copy
19.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top