Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Loresha Shamone Davis (Document 85, filed May 17, 2022)
Summary
AO 472 Order of Detention Pending Trial, Document 85, filed May 17, 2022 in a case captioned United States of America v. Loresha Shamone Davis, Case No. 2:22-CR-00205-JFW, U.S. District Court, Central District of California. The form is in four parts: eligibility for detention, findings on presumptions under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), analysis and reasons for detention after considering the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), and directions regarding detention. Part IV remands the defendant to the custody of the Attorney General or the Attorney General's designated representative.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Loresha Shamone Davis (Document 85, filed May 17, 2022).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-22-cr-00205-dkt-85-c-d-cal-09357e07a9/
, SHA-256 4af254748ec22701af7518f768f8252d92b5c206da4ee6b06079ee10fa9e3eda.Full text
Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 85 Filed 05/17/22 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:281
AO 472 (Rev. I 1/I6) Order of Detention Pending Trial
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Central District of California
United States of America
v.
Case No. 2:22-CR-00205-JFW—~
LORESHA SHAMONE DAVIS
Defendant
ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
Part I -Eligibility for Detention
Upon the
otion of the Government attorney pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3]420(1), or
Motion of the Government or Court's own motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(fl(2),
the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted. This order sets forth the Court's findings of fact
and conclusions of law, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3142(1), in addition to any other findings made at the hearing.
Part II -Findings of Fact and Law as to Presumptions under § 3142(e)
~ A. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C.§ 3142(e)(2)(previous violaror): There is a rebuttable
presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person
and the community because the following conditions have been met:
Q (1)the defendant is charged with one of the following crimes described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(fl(1):
~(a)a crime of violence, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, or an offense listed in 18 U.S.C.
§ 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed; or
~(b)an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; or
~(c) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the
Controlled Substances Act(21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
(21 U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C.(46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508); or
~(d)any felony if such person has been convicted of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs
(a) through (c) of this paragraph, or two or more State or local offenses that would have been offenses
described in subparagraphs(a)through (c) of this paragraph if a circumstance giving rise to Federal
jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses; or
~(e) any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence but involves:
(i) a minor victim;(ii) the possession of a firearm or destructive device (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921);
(iii) any other dangerous weapon; or (iv) a failure to register under 18 U.S.C. § 2250; and
~ (2)the defendant has previously been convicted of a Federal offense that is described in 18 U.S.C.
§ 3142(fl(1), or of a State or local offense that would have been such an offense if a circumstance giving rise
to Federal jurisdiction had existed; and
~ (3)the offense described in paragraph (2)above for which the defendant has been convicted was
committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a Federal, State, or local offense; and
~ (4)a period of not more than five years has elapsed since the date of conviction, or the release ofthe
defendant from imprisonment, for the offense described in paragraph (2)above, whichever is later.
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 85 Filed 05/17/22 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:282
AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial
~ B. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C.§ 3142(e)(3)(narcorics,firearm, other o~~enses): There is a
rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the
defendant as required and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to believe that the defendant
committed one or more of the following offenses:
~ (1)an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the
Controlled Substances Act(21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act(21
U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C.(46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508);
O (2)an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b;
~ (3)an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B)for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years
or more is prescribed;
~ (4)an offense under Chapter 77 of Title 18, U.S.C.(18 U.S.C. §§ 1581-1597)for which a maximum term of
imprisonment of 20 years or more is prescribed; or
~ (5)an offense involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(1), 2245,
2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2), 2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4),
2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425.
~ C. Conclusions Regarding Applicability of Any Presumption Established Above
~ The defendant has not introduced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption above, and detention is
ordered on that basis. (Parr ill need not be ~omp[eced.)
OR
d The defendant has presented evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption, but after considering the
presumption and the other factors discussed below, detention is warranted.
Part III -Analysis and Statement of the Reasons for Detention
After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) and the information presented at the detention hearing,
the Court concludes that the defendant must be detained pending trial because the Government has proven:
~y clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
the safety of any other person and the community.
~ By a preponderance of evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
the defendant's appearance as required.
In addition to any findings made on the record at the hearing, the reasons for detention include the following:
~ Weight of evidence against the defendant is strong
Q Subject to lengthy period of incarceration if convicted
Prior criminal history
articipation in criminal activity while on probation, parole, or supervision
History of violence or use of weapons
O History of alcohol or substance abuse
~ Lack of stable employment
~ Lack of stable residence
O Lack of financially responsible sureties
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 85 Filed 05/17/22 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:283
AO 472(Rev. 1 1/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial
~ Lack of significant community or family ties to this district
~ Significant family or other ties outside the United States
Q Lack of legal status in the United States
~ Subject to removal or deportation after serving any period of incarceration
~ Prior failure to appear in court as ordered
rior attempts)to evade law enforcement
~ Q
Use of aliases) or false documents
ckground information unknown or unverified
Prior violations of probation, parole, or supervised release
OTHER REASONS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION:
~~~~(~ ~ ~ Ll~~l~~
Part IV -Directions Regarding Detention
The defendant is remanded to the custody ofthe Attorney General or to the Attorney General's designated representative for
confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being
held in custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with
defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on re est of an attorney for the Government, the person in
charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to a ted States Marshal for purpose of an appearance in
connection with a court proceeding.
Date: ~ ~. _~ __ ~~ _
United States Magi trate Judge
r
wail J. ~t~ ~ ;~
Page 3 of 3
File and source
- File
- 85.pdf
- Size
- 170,948 bytes
- SHA-256
- 4af254748ec22701af7518f768f8252d92b5c206da4ee6b06079ee10fa9e3eda
- Our copy
- 85.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.