Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Amber Jane Wade (Document 130)

Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Amber Jane Wade (Document 130)

Summary

An AO 472 Order of Detention Pending Trial in United States of America v. Amber Jane Wade, Case No. 2:22-CR-00205-JFW-13, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Document 130, filed 05/20/22. The form has Part I on eligibility for detention, Part II on rebuttable presumptions under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), Part III on the analysis and reasons for detention, and Part IV on directions regarding detention. Part IV remands the defendant to the custody of the Attorney General or the Attorney General's designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility. The signature block reads United States Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Amber Jane Wade (Document 130).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-22-cr-00205-dkt-130-c-d-cal-f11a442fd9/, SHA-256 c64d8135be361f5816e714661ddf84a9a86b54409f2e10718743c425c9f4b685.

Full text

       Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 130 Filed 05/20/22 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:392


AO 472 (Rev. I I /l6) Order of Detention Pending Trial


                                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                                                      for the
                                                           Central District of California


                    United States of America
                                   v.
                                                                                Case No.     2:22-CR-00205-JFW-13
                      AMBER JANE WADE

                               Defendant


                                         ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL

                                                         Part I -Eligibility for Detention

      Upon the

                ~    otion of the Government attorney pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(fl(1), or
                    Motion of the Government or Court's own motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(fl(2),

the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted. This order sets forth the Court's findings of fact
and conclusions of law, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3142(1), in addition to any other findings made at the hearing.

                              Part II -Findings of Fact and Law as to Presumptions under § 3142(e)

  ~ A. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C.§ 3142(e)(2)(previous vtolaror): There is a rebuttable
    presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person
    and the community because the following conditions have been met:
        Q (1)the defendant is charged with one of the following crimes described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(fl(1):
             ~(a)a crime of violence, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, or an offense listed in 18 U.S.C.
                § 2332b(g)(5)(B)for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed; or
             ~(b)an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; or
             ~(c) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the
                Controlled Substances Act(21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
               (21 U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C.(46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508); or
             ~(d)any felony if such person has been convicted of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs
               (a)through (c)of this paragraph, or two or more State or local offenses that would have been offenses
                described in subparagraphs(a)through (c)of this paragraph if a circumstance giving rise to Federal
               jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses; or
             ~(e) any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence but involves:
               (i) a minor victim;(ii) the possession of a firearm or destructive device (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921);
               (iii) any other dangerous weapon; or (iv) a failure to register under 18 U.S.C. § 2250; and
        ~ (2)the defendant has previously been convicted of a Federal offense that is described in 18 U.S.C.
           § 3142(fl(1), or of a State or local offense that would have been such an offense if a circumstance giving rise
           to Federal jurisdiction had existed; and
        ~ (3)the offense described in paragraph (2)above for which the defendant has been convicted was
           committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a Federal, State, or local offense; and
        ~ (4)a period of not more than five years has elapsed since the date of conviction, or the release ofthe
           defendant from imprisonment, for the offense described in paragraph(2)above, whichever is later.


                                                                                                                    Page 1 of 3
       Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 130 Filed 05/20/22 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:393


AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial

   ~ B. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(narcortcs,firearm, other offenses): There is a
     rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the
     defendant as required and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to believe that the defendant
     committed one or more of the following offenses:
          Q (1)an offense for which a ma~cimum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the
            Controlled Substances Act(21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act(21
            U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C.(46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508);
          ~ (2)an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b;
          ~ (3)an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B)for which a ma~cimum term of imprisonment of 10 years
            or more is prescribed;
          ~ (4)an offense under Chapter 77 of Title 18, U.S.C.(18 U.S.C. §§ 1581-1597)for which a maximum term of
            imprisonment of 20 years or more is prescribed; or
          ~ (5)an offense involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(1), 2245,
            2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2), 2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4),
            2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425.

   ~ C. Conclusions Regarding Applicability of Any Presumption Established Above

            ~ The defendant has not introduced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption above, and detention is
               ordered on that basis. (Parr IU need not be completed.)

               OR

            ~ The defendant has presented evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption, but after considering the
              presumption and the other factors discussed below, detention is warranted.

                                  Part III -Analysis and Statement of the Reasons for Detention

     After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) and the information presented at the detention hearing,
the Court concludes that the defendant must be detained pending trial because the Government has proven:

       y clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
      t safety of any other person and the community.

      By a preponderance of evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
      he defendant's appearance as required.

In addition to any findings made on the record at the hearing, the reasons for detention include the following:

            eight of evidence against the defendant is strong
      `~    bject to lengthy period of incarceration if convicted
         Prior criminal history
       ~ Participation m criminal activity while on probation, parole, or supervision
       ~ 'story of violence or use of weapons
           istory of alcohol or substance abuse
             k of stable employment
           ack of stable residence
           ack of financially responsible sureties


                                                                                                                    Page 2 of 3
        Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 130 Filed 05/20/22 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:394


AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial

        ~ Lack of significant community or family ties to this district
        ~ Significant family or other ties outside the United States
        ~ Lack of legal status in the United States
        ~ Subject to removal or deportation after serving any period of incarceration
        O Prior failure to appear in court as ordered
        ~ Prior attempts)to evade law enforcement
        ~ se of aliases) or false documents
          Background information unknown or unverified
        ~ Prior violations of probation, parole, or supervised release

OTHER REASONS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION:




                                                Part IV -Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is remanded to the custody ofthe Attorney General or to the Attorney General's designated representative for
confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being
held in custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a re sonable opportunity for private consultation with
defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on requ t of an attorney for the Government, the person in
charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to a Uni d States Marshal for the pure se of an appearance in
connection with a court proceeding.

Date:
                                                                            United States Magistrate Judge

                                                                                     Gail J. Standish

                                                                                                                     Page 3 of 3


File and source

File
130.pdf
Size
170,208 bytes
SHA-256
c64d8135be361f5816e714661ddf84a9a86b54409f2e10718743c425c9f4b685
Our copy
130.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top