Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Complaint in Intervention — Quesenberry v. JMG (C.D. Cal.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Complaint in Intervention — Quesenberry v. JMG (C.D. Cal.)

Summary

The United States' complaint in intervention with jury demand, filed 08/28/24 as Document 41 in United States ex rel. Bryan Quesenberry v. JMG Investments, Inc. and Jeffrey Schwartz, Case No. CV 20-08497 MWF (ASx), in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The government brings False Claims Act and common law claims, alleging that JMG and its owner Schwartz obtained and retained a second, duplicate PPP loan in 2020 although JMG was permitted only one, with Schwartz falsely certifying on both applications. It states Bank of America disbursed a $505,987.00 loan to JMG on or about May 15, 2020 and Fountainhead SBF disbursed a $501,588 loan on or about May 22, 2020. The complaint alleges the government paid lender processing fees of $15,047 and forgave the duplicate loan, for a total loss of $516,635, and seeks treble damages and penalties.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 255 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name41.pdf
SHA-2562c357db2a4ca77095eb6aa8127bfa70eb08b59e216c06fca43cf0ab1fd8e402e
Size261,288 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
41.pdf
Size
261,288 bytes
SHA-256
2c357db2a4ca77095eb6aa8127bfa70eb08b59e216c06fca43cf0ab1fd8e402e
Our copy
41.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top