Errata to Defendants' Reply — Passive Income Advisors (D. Nev.)

Summary

An errata to the defendants' reply in support of their second motion for summary judgment in United States of America ex rel. Bryan Quesenberry v. Passive Income Advisors, LLC, and Gena Lofton, Case No. 2:20-cv-01537-RFB-MDC, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, filed September 15, 2025 as Document 68. It corrects a paragraph of the reply (ECF No. 66, filed September 11, 2025) that said the Department of Justice blocked the deposition of an SBA official by invoking agency privilege. The defendants acknowledge that no formal deposition notice was issued and no written invocation of privilege was received. They describe the official's cancelled meeting and a telephone call in April 2025, and ask the court to consider the corrected version. The errata is signed /s/ Leo Flangas for the defendants.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used