Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Order — United States v. Dadyan and Ayvazyan (Dkt. 1383, C.D. Cal.)
Summary
An Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, file-stamped May 30 2023 and entered as Document 1383 in Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW (C.D. Cal.). It carries Nos. 21-50237 (Vahe Dadyan) and 21-50302 (Artur Ayvazyan), each United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. a Defendant-Appellant, before Circuit Judges M. Smith and Desai and District Judge Amon. The order states that counsel should be prepared to discuss at oral argument the approach the Seventh Circuit adopted in United States v. Dokich regarding cases in which the amount of restitution that the district court imposed is greater than the amount of loss that it found at sentencing.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Order — United States v. Dadyan and Ayvazyan (Dkt. 1383, C.D. Cal.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-20-cr-00579-dkt-1383-c-d-cal-2982c5e1bc/
, SHA-256 1ca07f7622905e582e44f6b087d247b389df5d39c2b877145ba764109c2f33b8.Full text
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 1383 Filed 05/30/23 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:20877
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAY 30 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50237
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
2:20-cr-00579-SVW-8
v. Central District of California,
Los Angeles
VAHE DADYAN,
ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50302
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos.
2:20-cr-00579-SVW-3
v. 2:20-cr-00579-SVW
ARTUR AYVAZYAN, AKA Arthur
Ayvazyan,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: M. SMITH and DESAI, Circuit Judges, and AMON,* District Judge.
Counsel should be prepared to discuss at oral argument the approach that the
Seventh Circuit adopted in United States v. Dokich, 614 F.3d 314 (7th Cir. 2010)
regarding cases in which the amount of restitution that the district court imposed is
greater than the amount of loss that it found at sentencing.
*
The Honorable Carol Bagley Amon, United States District Judge for
the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
File and source
- File
- 1383.pdf
- Size
- 37,893 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1ca07f7622905e582e44f6b087d247b389df5d39c2b877145ba764109c2f33b8
- Our copy
- 1383.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.