Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Manh Hgoc Nguyen (E.D.N.Y., Dkt. 15, December 10, 2020)

Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Manh Hgoc Nguyen (E.D.N.Y., Dkt. 15, December 10, 2020)

Summary

An Order of Detention Pending Trial on form AO 472, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Case No. 20-CR-486-JS, Document 15, filed December 10, 2020. The form sets out Part I on eligibility for detention, Part II on rebuttable presumptions under § 3142(e)(2) and § 3142(e)(3), and Part III on the reasons for detention under the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), with a list of reasons and a line for further explanation. Part IV remands the defendant to the custody of the Attorney General or the Attorney General's designated representative. The signature line reads /s/ Anne Y. Shields, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order of Detention Pending Trial — United States v. Manh Hgoc Nguyen (E.D.N.Y., Dkt. 15, December 10, 2020).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-20-cr-00486-dkt-15-e-d-n-y-5872171299/, SHA-256 12ed0a8a107b8c4713fdf15d15469ca3031031a7a39313007d46e5c917d43edc.

Full text

          Case 2:20-cr-00486-JS-AYS Document 15 Filed 12/10/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 38


AO 472 (Rev. 09/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial


                                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                                                    for the
                                                        Eastern District of New York

                    United States of America                            )
                                  V.                                    )
                                                                        )     Case No. 20-CR-486-JS
                       Manh Hgoc Nguyen                                 )
                              Defendant                                 )

                                        ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
                                                       Part I - Eligibility for Detention

       Upon the

               ~otion of the Government attorney pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(l), or
               D Motion of the Government or Court's own motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2),
the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted. This order sets forth the Court's findings of fact
and conclusions of law, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), in addition to any other findings made at the hearing.

                              Part II - Findings of Fact and Law as to Presumptions under§ 3142(e)

   DA. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2) (previous violator): There is a rebuttable
    presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person
    and the community because the following conditions have been met:
        D (1) the defendant is charged with one of the following crimes described in 18 U.S.C. § 3 l 42(t)( 1):
             D (a) a crime of violence, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, or an offense listed in 18 U.S.C.
                  § 2332b(g)(5)(8) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of IO years or more is prescribed; or
             D (b) an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; or
             D (c) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of IO years or more is prescribed in the
                  Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904 ), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
                  (21 U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 ofTitle 46, U.S.C. (46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508); or
             D (d) any felony if such person has been convicted of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs
                  (a) through (c) of this paragraph, or two or more State or local offenses that would have been offenses
                  described in subparagraphs (a) through (c) of this paragraph if a circumstance giving rise to Federal
                  jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses; or
             D (e) any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence but involves:
                  (i) a minor victim; (ii) the possession of a firearm or destructive device (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921 );
                  (iii) any other dangerous weapon; or (iv) a failure to register under 18 U.S.C. § 2250; and
        D (2) the defendant has previously been convicted of a Federal offense that is described in 18 U.S.C.
           § 3 l 42(t)( 1), or of a State or local offense that would have been such an offense if a circumstance giving rise
           to Federal jurisdiction had existed; and
            D (3) the offense described in paragraph (2) above for which the defendant has been convicted was
              committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a Federal, State, or local offense; and
            D (4) a period of not more than five years has elapsed since the date of conviction, or the release of the
              defendant from imprisonment, for the offense described in paragraph (2) above, whichever is later.
                                                                                                                     Page I of3
         Case 2:20-cr-00486-JS-AYS Document 15 Filed 12/10/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 39


AO 472 (Rev. 09/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial

  OB. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3) (narcotics,firearm, other offenses): There is a
      rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the
      defendant as required and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to believe that the defendant
      committed one or more of the following offenses:
          D (1) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the
             Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21
             U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C. (46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508);
          D (2) an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c}, 956(a), or 2332b;
          D (3) an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years
                or more is prescribed;
            D (4) an offense under Chapter 77 of Title 18, U.S.C. (18 U.S.C. §§ 1581-1597) for which a maximum term of
                imprisonment of 20 years or more is prescribed; or
            D (5) an offense involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(l), 2245,
                2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(l}, 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(l), 2252A(a)(2), 2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4),
                2260,2421,2422,2423,or2425.

   De. Conclusions Regarding Applicability of Any Presumption Established Above
            D The defendant has not introduced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption above.
                OR
            D The defendant has presented evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption, but after considering the
                presumption and the other factors discussed below, detention is warranted.

                                   Part III - Analysis and Statement of the Reasons for Detention

     After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) and the information presented at the detention hearing,
the Court concludes that the defendant must be detained pending trial because the Government has proven:

   D By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
       the safety of any other person and the community.

   ~ y a preponderance of evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
       the defendant's appearance as required.

In addition to any findings made on the record at the hearing, the reasons for detention include the following:

       ~ight of evidence against the defendant is strong
       D Subject to lengthy period of incarceration if convicted
       D Prior criminal history
       D Participation in criminal activity while on probation, parole, or supervision
       D History of violence or use of weapons
       D History of alcohol or substance abuse
       D Lack of stable employment
       D ~ack of stable residence
       (¥"Lack of financially responsible sureties
       D Lack of significant community or family ties to this district
       ~ignificant family or other ties outside the United States

                                                                                                                    Page 2 ofl
         Case 2:20-cr-00486-JS-AYS Document 15 Filed 12/10/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 40


AO 472 (Rev. 09/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial

        D Lack of legal status in the United States
        D Subject to removal or deportation after serving any period of incarceration
        D Prior failure to appear in court as ordered
        D Prior attempt(s) to evade law enforcement
        D Use of alias(es) or false documents
        D Background information unknown or unverified
        D Prior violations of probation, parole, or supervised release
OTHER REASONS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION:




                                                Part IV - Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the Attorney General or to the Attorney General's designated representative
for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or
being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation
with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the
person in charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an
appearance in connection with a court proceeding.                   ~

Date:                                                                                               /s/ Anne Y. Shields
                                                                            Umteel :States Magistrate Judge




                                                                                                                          Page 3 of 3


File and source

File
15.pdf
Size
200,106 bytes
SHA-256
12ed0a8a107b8c4713fdf15d15469ca3031031a7a39313007d46e5c917d43edc
Our copy
15.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top