Answer — Integra v. Providence (Dkt. 91, C.D. Cal.)

Summary

Defendant J.A. Thomas and Associates, Inc.'s answer to the relator's second amended complaint in United States ex rel. Integra Med Analytics LLC v. Providence Health & Services, et al., No. 2:17-cv-01694-PSG-SS, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, filed August 21, 2019 as Document 91. The answer is made subject to the court's Order dated July 16, 2019 (Dkt. 82) on the motions to dismiss, and JATA denies each allegation not expressly admitted. JATA admits it has agreements with certain Providence hospitals, that it has provided clinical documentation improvement products and services for more than 20 years, and that its Documentation Tips and a training video are publicly available. The 30-page answer asserts affirmative defenses and asks for dismissal with prejudice; it is signed by Michael M. Maddigan of Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used