Joint Supplemental Brief — Integra v. Providence (C.D. Cal.)

Summary

The defendants' joint supplemental brief in support of their motions to dismiss the second amended complaint, filed March 8, 2019 as Document 77 in United States ex rel. Integra Med Analytics LLC v. Providence Health Services, et al., No. 2:17-cv-01694-PSG-SS, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Filed by counsel for J.A. Thomas and Associates, Inc. and the Providence Defendants, the 36-page brief argues that the Medicare claims data and OIG reports alone trigger the False Claims Act's public disclosure bar. It contends that website disclosures about JATA's business practices fall within the ordinary meaning of news media and that Rule 12(b)(6) is an appropriate vehicle to dismiss on public disclosure grounds. The introduction states that Integra has no actual knowledge of any defendant's conduct regarding any Medicare claim.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used