Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Detention Order — United States v. Michael Quesenberry, No. 2:14-mj-00281

Detention Order — United States v. Michael Quesenberry, No. 2:14-mj-00281

Summary

A Detention Order, Document 4 in Case 2:14-mj-00281-AC, filed December 08, 2014, in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, in United States of America v. Michael Quesenberry, signed as Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. After a detention hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court orders the defendant detained under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i). The form sets out a statement of reasons based on a preponderance of the evidence as to appearance and clear and convincing evidence as to safety, findings of fact drawn from the Pretrial Services Report, rebuttable presumptions, and additional directives under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4).

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Detention Order — United States v. Michael Quesenberry, No. 2:14-mj-00281.” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-2-14-mj-00281-dkt-4-e-d-cal-547e88a4dc/, SHA-256 90e927a2cfa11ff93cd2bf0098fa9655231eb855f28ea8c3cf1b2350270231f4.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

° . Case 2:14-mj-00281-AC Document 4 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA _ FILED
December 08, 2014

CLERK, US DSITRIGT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:140mj-00281-AC
Plaintiff,
V.
DETENTION ORDER
MICHAEL QUESENBERRY,
Defendant.

A. Order For Detention
After conducting a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court
orders the above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i).

B. Statement Of Reasons For The Detention
Theourt orders the defendant's detention because it finds:
By a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably

assure the appearance of the defendant as required.
[| By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably

assure the safety of any other person and the community.

C. Eindings of Fact
The Court’s findings are based on the evidence which was presented in Court and that which was
contained in the Pretrial Services Report, and includes the following:
[ | (1) Nature and Circumstances of the offense charged:
[| (a) The crime.
[_] (b) The offense is a crime of violence.
[| (c) The offense involves a narcotic drug.
[ (d) The offense involves a large amount of controlled substances.
[_] 2) The weight of the evidence against the defendant is high.
+6) The history and characteristics of the defendant including: UMliinorn -
(a) General Factors: Aetch-et iu! CARY
[] The defendant appears to have a mental condition which may affect whether the

defendant will appear.
The defendant has no known family ties in the area.

The defendant has no known steady employment.

The defendant has no known substantial financial resources.

The defendant is not a long time resident of the community.

The defendant does not have any known significant community ties.
Past conduct of the defendant: LK >

The defendant has a history relating to drug abuse.
The defendant has a significant prior criminal record.
The defendant has a prior record of failure to appear at court proceedings.
Defendant: MI
“Case Number:

D.

DATE: 1016/2014

(4)

eS re rca aa Document 4 Filed 12/08/14 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 or 2

(b) Whether the defendant was on probation, parole, or release by a court;
At the time of the current arrest, the defendant was on:

Probation

role
—/pelosee pending trial, sentence, appeal or completion of sentence.

(c) Other Factors:

The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation.
The defendant is a legal alien and will be subject to deportation if convicted.

Rebuttable Presumptions

In determining that the defendant should be detained, the court also relied on the following
rebuttable presumption(s) contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), which the court finds the
defendant has not rebutted:

(1)

The crime charged is one described in § 3142(f)(1) viz.

(A) a crime of violence; or

(B) an offense for which the maximum penalty is life imprisonment or death; or
(C) a controlled substance violation that has a maximum penalty of ten years or
more; or

(D) a felony and defendant previously was convicted of two or more of the
offenses described in (A) through (C) above and

Defendant previously has been convicted of one of the crimes listed in
subparagraph (1)(A)-(C), above and

The offense referred to in subparagraph (2) was committed while defendant was
on release pending trial and

Not more than five years has elapsed since the date of conviction or release from
imprisonment for the offense referred to in subparagraph (2).

There is probable cause to believe that defendant committed an offense for which a
maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed

in the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801, et seq.,

the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 951, et seq.,
the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.C. App. §§ 1901, et seq., or
an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b.

an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(1), 2245, 2251,
2251A, 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2),
2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4), 2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425.

Additional Directives
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4), the Court directs that:

The defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a
corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or
being held in custody pending appeal; and

The defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his counsel; and

That, on order of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government,
the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to
a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a caurt proceeding.

Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney


File and source

File
4.pdf
Size
45,256 bytes
SHA-256
90e927a2cfa11ff93cd2bf0098fa9655231eb855f28ea8c3cf1b2350270231f4
Our copy
4.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top