Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Qui Tam Complaint — Verity Investigations v. Semblex (D. Del.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Qui Tam Complaint — Verity Investigations v. Semblex (D. Del.)

Summary

A qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act, United States of America ex rel. Verity Investigations, LLC v. Semblex Corporation, Case No. 1:25-cv-264-UNA, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, filed under seal March 6, 2025 as Document 2. The relator alleges that Semblex falsely certified that it and its affiliates had 272 employees and that it was not owned by an entity with significant operations in China, obtaining a Second Draw PPP loan of $2,000,000 that was later forgiven. It alleges Semblex is part of a larger corporate group with far more than 300 employees, which the Second Draw program barred. The complaint seeks treble damages, civil penalties of $13,946 to $27,894 per claim, a relator's award and a jury trial; counsel are Farnan LLP and Susman Godfrey L.L.P.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 7.4 MB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name2.pdf
SHA-256168bc638af071bbe12c9122c2e49fa908e94c9f2acceb3a1ddeedf75ebc584fc
Size7,753,312 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
2.pdf
Size
7,753,312 bytes
SHA-256
168bc638af071bbe12c9122c2e49fa908e94c9f2acceb3a1ddeedf75ebc584fc
Our copy
2.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top