Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (D. Mass., Dkt. 22, April 21, 2025)
Summary
A Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, Document 22, filed 04/21/25 in Case 1:24-cv-11177-PBS, United States of America ex rel. Aidan Forsyth v. The Herb Chambers Companies, et al., No. 24-CV-11177-PBS, in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The United States and the relator state that, under the settlement agreement executed on April 9, 2025, the matter is dismissed with prejudice as to the Covered Conduct. They state that as to any other allegations it is dismissed with prejudice as to the relator but without prejudice as to the United States. The settling parties agree that the Court retains jurisdiction and venue for any dispute relating to the Settlement Agreement, and the stipulation is dated April 21, 2025.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (D. Mass., Dkt. 22, April 21, 2025).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-24-cv-11177-dkt-22-d-mass-bba042a78d/
, SHA-256 f96b2914f1af83a35a309b22d26aa64581b6e787d864fe88e7ae550f121ccdf9.Full text
Case 1:24-cv-11177-PBS Document 22 Filed 04/21/25 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
__________________________________________
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
ex rel. AIDAN FORSYTH, )
)
Plaintiff, )
v. )
)
THE HERB CHAMBERS COMPANIES, et al., ) No. 24-CV-11177-PBS
)
Defendants. )
)
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the qui tam
provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), and in accordance with the terms
and conditions of the settlement agreement executed on April 9, 2025 (“Settlement
Agreement”), the United States and the relator, Aidan Forsyth, hereby jointly stipulate to the
entry of an order dismissing this matter as follows:
1. As to the Covered Conduct, as that term is defined in Recital Paragraph J of the
Settlement Agreement, this matter is dismissed with prejudice; and
2. As to any other allegations in the complaint, this matter is dismissed with prejudice
as to the relator, but without prejudice as to the United States.
By agreement of the settling parties, this Court shall retain jurisdiction and venue for any
dispute relating to the Settlement Agreement.
Case 1:24-cv-11177-PBS Document 22 Filed 04/21/25 Page 2 of 2
Respectfully submitted,
LEAH B. FOLEY
United States Attorney
Dated: April 21, 2025 By: /s/ Alexandra Brazier
Charles B. Weinograd
Alexandra Brazier
Assistant United States Attorneys
United States Attorney’s Office
1 Courthouse Way, Suite 9200
Boston, MA 02210
(617) 748-3100
Charles.Weinograd@usdoj.gov
Alexandra.Brazier@usdoj.gov
Counsel for Relator
/s/ Eric H. Jaso
Eric H. Jaso
Spiro Harrison & Nelson
Christine M. Kingston
Nystrom Beckman Paris LLP
363 Bloomfield Avenue, Suite 2C
Montclair, NJ 07042
973-310-4026
ejaso@shnlegal.com
ckingston@nbparis.com
LOCAL RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATION
The undersigned counsel certifies, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(2), that counsel for the
United States has conferred with counsel for the relator, and the relator joins in the filing of this
stipulation of dismissal.
Dated: April 21, 2025 By: /s/ Alexandra Brazier
Alexandra Brazier
Assistant United States Attorney
2
File and source
- File
- 22.pdf
- Size
- 123,537 bytes
- SHA-256
- f96b2914f1af83a35a309b22d26aa64581b6e787d864fe88e7ae550f121ccdf9
- Our copy
- 22.pdf
- Original
- archive.org