Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Qui Tam Complaint — Forsyth v. Herb Chambers (D. Mass.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Qui Tam Complaint — Forsyth v. Herb Chambers (D. Mass.)

Summary

A qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act, United States of America ex rel. Aidan Forsyth v. Herb Chambers 395 Broadway Inc., et al., No. 1:24-cv-11177, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed under seal on May 2, 2024 as Document 1. The relator alleges that twenty-nine HCC entities received a total of $30,253,955.90 of forgiven first-draw PPP loans, of which $7,659,391.13 exceeded the SBA's $20,000,000.00 limit for affiliated corporate entities. It alleges, upon information and belief, that the Eight Entities named as defendants canceled their original first-draw loans and reapplied to avoid the limit, and obtained forgiveness in or about May 2021. The complaint seeks treble damages, civil penalties of $13,946.00 to $27,894.00 per claim and a jury trial, and is signed by Christine M. Kingston for the relator.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 1.5 MB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name1.pdf
SHA-256545a38a1aabebdb04e6b542a0821accfef4550b0e5b3c8d35b7f3540f830bfec
Size1,571,876 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
1.pdf
Size
1,571,876 bytes
SHA-256
545a38a1aabebdb04e6b542a0821accfef4550b0e5b3c8d35b7f3540f830bfec
Our copy
1.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top