Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Government's Sentencing Memorandum — United States v. Ernest P. Ricci (D.R.I., Dkt. 75, May 23, 2024)

Government's Sentencing Memorandum — United States v. Ernest P. Ricci (D.R.I., Dkt. 75, May 23, 2024)

Summary

The Government's Sentencing Memorandum (Document 75) in United States of America v. Ernest P. Ricci, Cr. No. 23-34-JJM, in the District Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island, filed May 23, 2024. The government recommends a high-end guideline sentence of 57 months of imprisonment, a forfeiture money judgment and restitution of $129,306 to the Small Business Administration, a fine of $10,000, and 3 years of supervised release with a condition to cooperate with the Internal Revenue Service. The memorandum asserts that the defendant committed bankruptcy fraud in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and defrauded taxpayers through fraudulently obtained pandemic relief funds. It opposes the defendant's request for a probationary sentence based on a medical condition.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Government's Sentencing Memorandum — United States v. Ernest P. Ricci (D.R.I., Dkt. 75, May 23, 2024).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-23-cr-00034-dkt-75-d-r-i-f0614617a6/, SHA-256 64060e15597b25861973b046dc0055e60bdd59a4f938aa20865de98e45cab690.

Full text

Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS        Document 75       Filed 05/23/24   Page 1 of 10 PageID #:
                                          707


                  IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
                       FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND


  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                               Cr. No. 23-34-JJM
             v.
  ERNEST P. RICCI


                  GOVERNMENT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

        Defendant Ernest P. Ricci (“Ricci”) waged a multi-year campaign of fraud,

 harassment and abuse in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode

 Island. He committed bankruptcy fraud, obstructed court proceedings, filed false and

 forged documents, took frivolous appeals, and committed perjury. Over the course of

 years, he harassed, threatened and insulted the Chapter 7 Trustee and other

 professionals appointed by the United States Trustee to administer his bankruptcy

 estate, resulting in one long-serving attorney to withdraw from the practice. He did all

 of this because he simply doesn’t like to pay his bills.

        Moreover, he recruited multiple people to participate in his criminal scheme. His

 conduct led directly to the indictment, prosecution and conviction of his wife. He

 suborned the perjury of least two people during the proceedings, (his wife and

 unindicted co-conspirator R.L). In the process, he violated the attorney-client privilege

 between R.L. and his lawyer by impersonating R.L. through email communications

 with the attorney and directing R.L.’s litigation. This conduct demands a substantial

 incarcerative sentence.

        Ricci also defrauded taxpayers through fraudulently obtained pandemic relief

                                               1
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS        Document 75      Filed 05/23/24    Page 2 of 10 PageID #:
                                          708



 funds. This from a man who spent over a decade evading the payment of his own

 income tax obligations, while living in a home valued at nearly a million dollars and

 driving a brand-new Ford F150 billed to his wife’s business, as well as allegedly failing

 to pay his own employees their wages.

        After receiving the fraudulent proceeds, Ricci then laundered those funds,

 purchasing a house on West Shore Road in Warwick through a straw purchaser, which

 he concealed from the bankruptcy trustee.

        Learning that he was under criminal investigation did not deter Ricci. He

 contacted AirBnB and threatened them with litigation if they complied with a grand

 jury subpoena, and contacted the adult son of a witness and told the son that his father

 should not listen to the FBI. He also tried to get the son to pay the bankruptcy trustee

 on Ricci’s behalf and promised to pay the son back “with interest.”

        After being arrested and charged with multiple crimes in federal court, Ricci

 repeatedly violated the conditions of his release, resulting in his temporary pretrial

 detention. A non-exhaustive list of his pretrial misconduct includes concealing his

 possession of firearms from U.S. Probation; repeatedly violating a no-contact order with

 multiple witnesses; illegally conducting business activity; changing his residence

 without permission from Probation; and repeatedly failing to report police contact.

 Even after pleading guilty, Ricci violated the no-contact order by sending a letter to the

 Assistant U.S. Trustee, in which he offered to “go undercover.” All Ricci asked for in

 return was to “not have to face the judge and become a felon.”
                                              2
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS           Document 75     Filed 05/23/24     Page 3 of 10 PageID #:
                                             709



        Each of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 sentencing factors calls for a substantial sentence in

 this case. Accordingly, the government recommends a high-end guideline sentence of

 57 months imprisonment; a forfeiture money judgment and restitution in the amount of

 $129,306 to the Small Business Administration, a fine in the amount of $10,000, and a

 period of 3 years supervised release, with a special condition of release that Ricci

 cooperate with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in the ascertainment and collection

 of his outstanding tax liability, including penalties and interest, including meeting with

 IRS representatives as often as necessary and providing complete and truthful

 information to them.

        The high-end guideline sentence requested by the government is justified.

 Ricci’s conduct is the worst among any bankruptcy defendant in the history of this

 district. As a result of the grouping rules, there is no increase in the offense level Ricci

 faces for the bankruptcy fraud attributable to the pandemic relief wire fraud and money

 laundering offenses. See PSR at ¶113. Each of these crimes warrants punishment and

 that conduct should be reflected in the Court’s sentence. Given the financial nature of

 this case and the likelihood that even with full restitution and a requirement to

 cooperate with the IRS, Ricci will likely still have successfully avoided paying many of

 his debts, a fine is appropriate.

                        Nature and Circumstances of the Offenses

        Ricci’s actions in this case demonstrate that he is a man who lacks respect for the

 law, lawyers, courts, and his fellow citizens. His actions also show that Ricci will stop

                                               3
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS       Document 75       Filed 05/23/24   Page 4 of 10 PageID #:
                                         710



 at nothing to get what he wants, and he has a brazen confidence that he will be allowed

 to engage in lawlessness, abuse, and lies without consequence. The nature of his

 offenses cries out for a sentence that will punish him for his crimes, promote respect for

 the law, and most importantly, protect the integrity of the court system.

       As the Chapter 7 Trustee observed in his impact statement, honesty is essential to

 the bankruptcy process. And yet Ricci approached the bankruptcy system with a

 dishonest purpose from the outset. Having lost his longshot attempt to preserve his

 oceanfront property in legal proceedings in Florida (where he behaved in much the

 same fashion as he did in the bankruptcy case) he abusively filed repeated bankruptcy

 petitions in order to benefit from the automatic stay. In his sentencing memorandum,

 Ricci attempts to explain his outrageous behavior as motivated by a desire to “save a

 valuable oceanfront piece of real estate located in Lighthouse Point, Florida.” His

 disingenuous excuse overlooks the fact that Ricci had not made mortgage payments on

 this property in years, all the while collecting income from AirBnB rentals.

       Throughout the bankruptcy proceedings Ricci engaged in multiple forms of

 deceit and obstruction. He intentionally wasted the time and resources of both the

 Chapter 7 Trustee and the United States Trustee over a period of years. In doing so, he

 made a mockery of the honest debtors who rely on bankruptcy protections and

 undermined the very system they rely on to obtain a fresh start in life. His actions

 should not go unpunished.

       During the bankruptcy proceedings, Ricci not only perjured himself, but also
                                             4
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS   Document 75   Filed 05/23/24   Page 5 of 10 PageID #:
                                     711
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS   Document 75   Filed 05/23/24   Page 6 of 10 PageID #:
                                     712
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS   Document 75   Filed 05/23/24   Page 7 of 10 PageID #:
                                     713
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS        Document 75       Filed 05/23/24    Page 8 of 10 PageID #:
                                          714



 extent, he would ultimately only pay pennies on the dollar. Ricci is a master of the art

 of going “up to the line” and then, when he thinks he can get away with it, crossing that

 line. He was determined to make the bankruptcy process so painful for everyone else

 that they would give up in exhaustion.

        That approach continued throughout this criminal prosecution. In his sentencing

 memorandum, Ricci argues that he had “no issues” relating to his release since he

 began counseling in June of 2023. In fact, since that time, Ricci filed false tax returns

 with the IRS, was charged with crimes in Rhode Island Superior Court, misleadingly

 led Probation to believe those crimes were a civil work-related dispute, and sent a letter

 to the U.S. Trustee in contravention of the no-contact order, among other transgressions.

                The Need to Provide Defendant with Medical Treatment

        Ricci seeks to avoid a prison sentence based on his medical condition. Ricci’s

 motion for a sentencing variance to a straight probationary sentence would amount to a

 100% downward variance based on a medical condition which is treatable and in no

 way affected his ability to engage in this course of criminal conduct over multiple years.

 Such a sentence would be both procedurally and substantively unreasonable. While

 the government does not deny the medical condition exists, the defendant has a long

 history of manipulating and using it to his advantage to avoid consequences. It is not a

 coincidence the defendant has scheduled a procedure for approximately 4 weeks after

 the scheduled sentencing date, just beyond the ordinary time for self-reporting to BOP.

 When the defendant was released for “emergency” medical treatment during his

                                               8
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS        Document 75      Filed 05/23/24     Page 9 of 10 PageID #:
                                          715



 pretrial detention on April 28, 2023, he proceeded to schedule his “emergency”

 procedure for August 21, 2023, some four months later. Only when the government

 moved to end his temporary release and have him re-detained, did the defendant have

 procedure quickly moved to up to June 26, 2023, still two months later. Moreover,

 immediately after Ricci’s release from pretrial detention he engaged in witness

 tampering, resulting in the police being called. There is nothing in the record to

 suggest that the Bureau of Prisons is not more than capable of addressing the

 defendant’s medical needs. The BOP has policies and programs designed to meet the

 needs of aging inmates. See BOP Program Statement on the Management of Aging

 Offenders dated April 14, 2022.1 The defendant should not be permitted to avoid

 accountability for his conduct by portraying himself as incurably unhealthy.

                                         Conclusion

         For the reasons set forth herein, the government respectfully recommends a

 sentence of 57 months incarceration, full restitution, a fine of $10,000, and a term of

 supervised release to include special conditions requiring cooperation with the IRS.

                                                  Respectfully submitted,

                                                  ZACHARY A. CUNHA
                                                  UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

                                                  /s/ John P. McAdams
                                                  JOHN P. McADAMS
                                                  Assistant U. S. Attorney



 1
     Available at https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5241_001.pdf.

                                              9
Case 1:23-cr-00034-JJM-PAS     Document 75 Filed 05/23/24        Page 10 of 10 PageID #:
                                        716



                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I hereby certify that on May 23, 2024, I caused the Government’s Sentencing
 Memorandum to be filed electronically and it is available for viewing and downloading
 from the ECF system.

 Electronic Notification


 Ed Roy, Esq.


                                               /s/ John P. McAdams
                                               JOHN P. McADAMS
                                               Assistant U. S. Attorney,
                                               U. S. Attorney's Office
                                               One Financial Plaza, 17th Floor
                                               Providence, RI 02903
                                               401-709-5000




                                          10


File and source

File
75.pdf
Size
886,542 bytes
SHA-256
64060e15597b25861973b046dc0055e60bdd59a4f938aa20865de98e45cab690
Our copy
75.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top