Order Adopting Final Report and Recommendation — United States v. Jokave Leone Harris (N.D. Ga., Dkt. 55)
Summary
An order adopting a Final Report and Recommendation in United States v. Jokave Leone Harris, Criminal Action No. 1:22-CR-00324-JPB, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, dated September 27, 2023. The order states that no objections were filed to the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. 52] and that the Court reviewed it for clear error and finds none. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation, denies the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 47], and denies the Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. 45] as moot.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Adopting Final Report and Recommendation — United States v. Jokave Leone Harris (N.D. Ga., Dkt. 55).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-22-cr-00324-dkt-55-n-d-ga-5f1e868910/
, SHA-256 836f156225ede7dd9ba9dba9596d1493f0ec9a8bacd0d9730f80d2abda1e66ce.Full text
Case 1:22-cr-00324-JPB-JSA Document 55 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v. CRIMINAL ACTION NO.
1:22-CR-00324-JPB
JOKAVE LEONE HARRIS,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and
Recommendation [Doc. 52]. No objections were filed. This Court finds as
follows:
A district judge has broad discretion to accept, reject or modify a magistrate
judge’s proposed findings and recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447
U.S. 667, 680 (1980). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court reviews any
portion of the Report and Recommendation that is the subject of a proper objection
on a de novo basis and any non-objected-to portion under a “clearly erroneous”
standard. See also Fed R. Crim. Pro. 59(b)(3). Because no objections have been
filed, the Court has reviewed the Final Report and Recommendation for clear error
and finds none.
Case 1:22-cr-00324-JPB-JSA Document 55 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, the Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Final Report and
Recommendation [Doc. 52] as the judgment of the Court. For the reasons stated in
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Motion to Suppress
Evidence [Doc. 47] is DENIED, and the Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. 45]
is DENIED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2023.
2
File and source
- File
- 55.pdf
- Size
- 158,096 bytes
- SHA-256
- 836f156225ede7dd9ba9dba9596d1493f0ec9a8bacd0d9730f80d2abda1e66ce
- Our copy
- 55.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.