Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Adopting Final Report and Recommendation — United States v. Jokave Leone Harris (N.D. Ga., Dkt. 55)

Order Adopting Final Report and Recommendation — United States v. Jokave Leone Harris (N.D. Ga., Dkt. 55)

Summary

An order adopting a Final Report and Recommendation in United States v. Jokave Leone Harris, Criminal Action No. 1:22-CR-00324-JPB, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, dated September 27, 2023. The order states that no objections were filed to the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. 52] and that the Court reviewed it for clear error and finds none. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation, denies the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 47], and denies the Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. 45] as moot.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Adopting Final Report and Recommendation — United States v. Jokave Leone Harris (N.D. Ga., Dkt. 55).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-22-cr-00324-dkt-55-n-d-ga-5f1e868910/, SHA-256 836f156225ede7dd9ba9dba9596d1493f0ec9a8bacd0d9730f80d2abda1e66ce.

Full text

      Case 1:22-cr-00324-JPB-JSA Document 55 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 2




                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                     NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
                          ATLANTA DIVISION

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


       v.                                     CRIMINAL ACTION NO.
                                              1:22-CR-00324-JPB
 JOKAVE LEONE HARRIS,

             Defendant.


    ORDER ADOPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

      This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and

Recommendation [Doc. 52]. No objections were filed. This Court finds as

follows:

      A district judge has broad discretion to accept, reject or modify a magistrate

judge’s proposed findings and recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447

U.S. 667, 680 (1980). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court reviews any

portion of the Report and Recommendation that is the subject of a proper objection

on a de novo basis and any non-objected-to portion under a “clearly erroneous”

standard. See also Fed R. Crim. Pro. 59(b)(3). Because no objections have been

filed, the Court has reviewed the Final Report and Recommendation for clear error

and finds none.
      Case 1:22-cr-00324-JPB-JSA Document 55 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 2




      Accordingly, the Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Final Report and

Recommendation [Doc. 52] as the judgment of the Court. For the reasons stated in

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Motion to Suppress

Evidence [Doc. 47] is DENIED, and the Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. 45]

is DENIED AS MOOT.

      SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2023.




                                       2


File and source

File
55.pdf
Size
158,096 bytes
SHA-256
836f156225ede7dd9ba9dba9596d1493f0ec9a8bacd0d9730f80d2abda1e66ce
Our copy
55.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top