Superseding Information — United States v. Richard Wesley Robinson (D. Md., Dkt. 39, July 19, 2023)
Summary
A Superseding Information filed 07/19/23 in United States v. Richard Wesley Robinson, Case 1:22-cr-00148-ELH (Criminal No. ELH-22-148), Document 39, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Count One, Coercion and Enticement, charges that on or about July 17, 2018, in the District of Maryland, the defendant knowingly attempted to and did persuade, induce, entice, and coerce John Doe 1, who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, citing 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b), 2427. A Forfeiture Allegation gives notice that the United States will seek forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 2428 and lists cell phones and a desktop computer. The name of Erek L. Barron, United States Attorney, appears with the date July 19, 2023.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Superseding Information — United States v. Richard Wesley Robinson (D. Md., Dkt. 39, July 19, 2023).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-22-cr-00148-dkt-39-d-md-5dedecdce9/
, SHA-256 dccad262085728f579147e9b686e2d85225ebdb267bdcb659b833d16f744ecce.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 1:22-cr-00148-ELH Document 39 Filed 07/19/23 Page 1 of 3 JDM 7.19.23 PEB: USAO 2022R00245 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cs FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND es UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. ELH-22-148 v. (Coercion and Enticement, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b); Forfeiture, 18 U.S.C. § 2428, 21 RICHARD WESLEY ROBINSON, U.S.C. § 853(p), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)) Defendant. SUPERSEDING INFORMATION COUNT ONE (Coercion and Enticement) The United States Attorney for the District of Maryland charges that: On or about July 17, 2018, in the District of Maryland, the defendant, RICHARD WESLEY ROBINSON, using any facility and means of interstate and foreign commerce, knowingly attempted to and did persuade, induce, entice, and coerce John Doe 1, who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b), 2427 Case 1:22-cr-00148-ELH Document 39 Filed 07/19/23 Page 2 of 3 FORFEITURE ALLEGATION The United States Attorney for the District of Maryland further alleges that: 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2, notice is hereby given to the defendant that the United States will seek forfeiture as part of any sentence in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 2428, 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), in the event of the defendant’s conviction under Count One of this Superseding Information. Coercion and Enticement Forfeiture 2. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2428(a), upon conviction of the offense set forth in Count One of this Superseding Information, the defendant, RICHARD WESLEY ROBINSON shall forfeit to the United States: a. any interest in any property, real or personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of such violation; and b. any property, real or personal, constituting or derived from any proceeds that such person obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violation. 3. The property to be forfeited includes, but is not limited to, the following: a. A Samsung SM-A505U Galaxy A50 cell phone, IMEI number b. LG model VS985 4G cell phone, serial number 501K PHG0452873; c. LG model VS985 cell phone, IMEI number 352452067169661, and d. HP Desktop computer, serial number MXG60802QJ. Substitute Assets 4, If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant: Case 1:22-cr-00148-ELH Document 39 Filed 07/19/23 Page 3 of 3 a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; d. has been substantially diminished in value; or e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty, the United States shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). 18 U.S.C. § 2428(a) 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) Erek L. Barron United States Attorney Date: July 19, 2023
File and source
- File
- 39.pdf
- Size
- 815,583 bytes
- SHA-256
- dccad262085728f579147e9b686e2d85225ebdb267bdcb659b833d16f744ecce
- Our copy
- 39.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.