Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Report and Recommendation on Plea of Guilty — United States v. Frederick Eugene McLaurin (N.D. Tex., Dkt. 179)

Report and Recommendation on Plea of Guilty — United States v. Frederick Eugene McLaurin (N.D. Tex., Dkt. 179)

Summary

Document 179, filed 01/26/23, is a Report and Recommendation on Plea of Guilty Before United States Magistrate Judge in Case No. 1:22-CR-00074-H-BU, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Abilene Division. Defendant Frederick Eugene McLaurin (2) appeared with counsel under a plea bargain agreement and pleaded guilty to Count Seven of the fifteen-count Indictment, listed as 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), Possession with Intent to Distribute Heroin. The magistrate judge recommends that the plea be accepted, that the Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. The document is dated the 26th day of January, 2023, over the name of John R. Parker, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Report and Recommendation on Plea of Guilty — United States v. Frederick Eugene McLaurin (N.D. Tex., Dkt. 179).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-22-cr-00074-dkt-179-n-d-tex-bbceeb9f9f/, SHA-256 91af8e829f84a274553a50be3e28122d2f532b6f313e79850334cc4e985674ba.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:22-cr-00074-H-BU Document179_ Filed 01/26/23. Pagelof2 PagelD 353

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §
§
§
V. § CASE NO. 1:22-CR-00074-H-BU
§
§
FREDERICK EUGENE MCLAURIN (2) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA OF GUILTY
BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant, FREDERICK EUGENE MCLAURIN (2), by consent and under the authority
of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (Sth Cir. 1997), appeared with counsel before the
undersigned United States magistrate judge for the purpose of entering a plea of guilty under Rule
11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Defendant was placed under oath and personally examined in open court by the
undersigned concerning the subjects in Rule 11(b)(1) and the undersigned determined that
Defendant understood each subject.

Defendant pleaded guilty, under a plea bargain agreement with the government, to Count
Seven of the fifteen-count Indictment charging Defendant with a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§
841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C) Possession with Intent to Distribute Heroin. After examining Defendant
under oath, the undersigned magistrate judge finds the following:

1, Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing to enter this

guilty plea before a magistrate judge subject to final approval and sentencing by the

presiding district judge;

2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges, including each essential
element of the offense(s) charged, and the associated penalties;

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea agreement
supplement;
Case 1:22-cr-00074-H-BU Document179_ Filed 01/26/23. Page2of2 PagelD 354

4, Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes to waive those

rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right to appear before a United States

district judge;

5. Defendant’s plea is made freely and voluntarily;

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty;

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea of guilty; and

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of Defendant’s plea of guilty.

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant’s plea of guilty be accepted, that
Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly.

Although I have conducted these proceedings and accepted Defendant’s plea of guilty, the
United States district judge has the power to review my actions and possesses final decision-
making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if Defendant has any objections to these findings or
any other action of the undersigned, he is required to make those known to the United States district
judge within fourteen (14) days of today.

The Clerk will furnish a copy of this Order to each of attorney of record.

Signed on: 26th day of January, 2023.

OL.

JOHN R. PARKER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

File and source

File
179.pdf
Size
405,020 bytes
SHA-256
91af8e829f84a274553a50be3e28122d2f532b6f313e79850334cc4e985674ba
Our copy
179.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top