Detention Order (Violation of Supervised Release) — United States v. Blane Lee Smith (E.D. Cal., Dkt. 9)
Summary
Detention Order (Violation of Supervised Release) in United States v. Blane Lee Smith, Case No. 1:22-cr-00014-JLT, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Document 9, filed February 1, 2023. The form order recites that the defendant was arrested for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of supervised release and that a detention hearing was conducted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a). An X is printed beside the finding that the defendant has not met the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). It states that the finding is based on the reasons stated on the record.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Detention Order (Violation of Supervised Release) — United States v. Blane Lee Smith (E.D. Cal., Dkt. 9).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-22-cr-00014-dkt-9-e-d-cal-6c1dee7476/
, SHA-256 65299bfb0a635c97f7d4382317172112d3d80abe8df1304f36d2d93df9a9eb43.Full text
Case 1:22-cr-00014-JLT Document 9 Filed 02/01/23 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 1:22-cr-00014-JLT
12 Plaintiff, DETENTION ORDER
13 v. (Violation of Supervised Release)
14 BLANE LEE SMITH,
15 Defendant.
16
17 The defendant having been arrested for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his
supervised release; and
18
19 Having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure
32.l(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a), the Court finds that:
20
The defendant has not met defendant’s burden of establishing by clear and convincing
21 evidence that defendant is not likely to flee; and/or
22
X The defendant has not met defendant’s burden of establishing by clear and convincing
23 evidence that defendant is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person
or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c).
24
This finding is based on the reasons stated on the record.
25
26 IT IS SO ORDERED.
27 Dated: February 1, 2023 ___________________ _
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
File and source
- File
- 9.pdf
- Size
- 101,700 bytes
- SHA-256
- 65299bfb0a635c97f7d4382317172112d3d80abe8df1304f36d2d93df9a9eb43
- Our copy
- 9.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.