Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Plaintiff's Brief on Appeal — Athens v. Bank of America (D.N.H.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Plaintiff's Brief on Appeal — Athens v. Bank of America (D.N.H.)

Summary

A brief on appeal filed by plaintiff Natasha Athens, pro se, in Athens d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, on December 23, 2021 as Document 68. The brief argues that the Favorite Things PPP loan, funded May 14, 2020, was lawfully approved and cannot be pulled out of forgiveness, and it accuses the judges, defense counsel and Scholz of corruption and fraud. It quotes Bank of America emails, including a May 2020 message about a new loan amount of $18625 and a later message stating that the loan does not appear eligible for forgiveness. The 9-page brief is signed /s/ by Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 1.5 MB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name68-stricken-see-endorsed-order-dated-1-25-2022-brief-memorandum.pdf
SHA-256785ca3febb755674f6a1ea6083c760b9a921052509e0734eeffe07c5fe7946a2
Size1,586,046 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
68-stricken-see-endorsed-order-dated-1-25-2022-brief-memorandum.pdf
Size
1,586,046 bytes
SHA-256
785ca3febb755674f6a1ea6083c760b9a921052509e0734eeffe07c5fe7946a2
Our copy
68-stricken-see-endorsed-order-dated-1-25-2022-brief-memorandum.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top