Surreply — Athens v. Bank of America (D.N.H.)

Summary

A surreply filed November 19, 2021 as Document 47 by defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Megan Scholz to the plaintiff's reply (Doc. #44) on her Request for Immediate Sealing of Exhibits (Doc. #38) in Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The defendants respond to the plaintiff's argument that a default judgment should enter, stating that service through the court's electronic filing system is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b) and the court's electronic filing procedures. They state that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 33) was timely filed and served and that there is no basis for default judgment. They again assent to sealing the exhibits; the surreply is signed /s/ Thomas J. Pappas.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used