Motion for a Change of Venue — Athens v. Bank of America (D.N.H.)
Summary
A motion for a change of venue, filed September 28, 2021 as Document 12 in Favorite Things, a DBA of Natasha Athens, v. Bank of America et al, Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the United States District Court at Concord, NH. The plaintiff asks the court to move the case to North Carolina Federal Court in Charlotte NC and to hold hearings via zoom. The motion alleges judicial bias and delay in the court where the case was filed and refers to a pending state bar complaint and criminal complaints. It seeks an immediate ruling and states that the plaintiff will otherwise file in North Carolina. A certificate of service states it was sent to the defendants by email on September 28, 2021.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Motion for a Change of Venue — Athens v. Bank of America (D.N.H.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-21-cv-00748-dkt-12-f7ac372fee/
, SHA-256 10b884fac4242d95e54bbe6a3f992aa59017881ecb8e37431e2b692ba0aa03aa.Full text
Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 12 Filed 09/28/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Concord, NH
District of Merrimack NH Docket # 1:21 - CV-00748-SM
Favorite Things
a DBA
Natasha Athens
v.
Bank of America et al
Megan Scholz
Defendants
MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE
The Plaintiff requests a change of venue to North Carolina Federal Court in
Charlotte NC. They do not "sit on cases" , they actually move them like they
should be.
The Judical bias and compromise here is that there is not a lawful judge in the
state or federal court system, proven by this case, and other cases filed in federal
courts.
The Plaintiff seeks to move this to North Carolina Federal Court IMMEDIATELY,
and hold hearings via zoom. Due to the Plaintiff's age, and physical limitations,
she seeks virtual hearings vs. in front of a judge. There is a state bar complaint
pending, several state and federal criminal complaints pending, and this court is
unable to act as a lawful grounds for which to hear the issues in the complaint
and rule on them in accordance with banking laws, loan laws, federal laws, PPP
loan forgiveneness laws, etc. The delay shows court inability to operate within
federal laws.
The court needs to rule on this immediately and all for the change of venue vs,
the Plaintiff having to refile and start this over. The court is so corrupt and bias
that every judge, including the magistrate judge that HOLDS cases in this tiny
state w/ bias and severe abuse of power needs to be held liable for holding on to
this case and failing to serve it. In NC, cases are filed and then proceed as it
should be.
Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 12 Filed 09/28/21 Page 2 of 2
WHEREFORE, The Plaintiff's right is to forego her other right to legal arguement
and get this case out of NH. She seeks an immediate ruling to remove this case.
If the court fails to implement this ruling immediately, the Plaintiff will file in NC
court and be forced to hold the judges accountable for severing her right to
proceed in accordance with both banking laws and federal laws. The Plaintiff has
a RIGHT to an immediate release from this court, who has held up this case for
over a month, and showed its complicity in federal banking crimes.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON September 28, 2021
/s/
Megan Scholz and Bank of America Defendants via email
brian.t.moynihan@bankofamerica.com
megan.scholz@bofa.com
File and source
- File
- 12-emergency-motion-to-change-venue-bank-fraud-on-ppp-loan-forg.pdf
- Size
- 786,830 bytes
- SHA-256
- 10b884fac4242d95e54bbe6a3f992aa59017881ecb8e37431e2b692ba0aa03aa
- Original
- archive.org