Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Tatiana Daniel (S.D.N.Y., Dkt. 64)
Summary
A Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment in United States v. Tatiana Daniel, a/k/a "Kimora Daniel," Case 1:21-cr-00729-LAK, Document 64, filed December 21, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It recites that Tatiana Daniel was charged in a one-count Superseding Information with conspiracy to commit wire fraud under Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 and pled guilty to Count One under a plea agreement. The order provides that a money judgment of $109,655 in United States currency shall be entered against the Defendant, and that payments are made to the United States Marshals Service. Signature lines name Assistant United States Attorney Michael D. Neff and Ezra Spilke, Esq.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Tatiana Daniel (S.D.N.Y., Dkt. 64).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-21-cr-00729-dkt-64-s-d-n-y-d12793b674/
, SHA-256 ce4b31acef1bd7a98df4b0064580cb3ca0302089363f4b4a87dea0bc2ccefed0.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC # SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:_1 A-2/-2A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER -V.- OF FORFEITURE/ : MONEY JUDGMENT TATIANA DANIEL, a/k/a “Kimora Daniel,” : S121 Cr. 729 (LAK) Defendant. : WHEREAS, on or about November , 2022, TATIANA DANIEL, a/k/a “Kimora Daniel” (the “Defendant”), was charged in a one-count Superseding Information, Sl 21 Cr. 729 (LAK) (the “Information”), with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 (Count One), . WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information; WHEREAS, on or about November __, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1 (C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461 (c), a sum of money equal to $109,655 ee AS OL Lape OL 29-1 AK Document64 Filed 12/21/22. Page 2 of 4 in United States currency, representing the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information; WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $109,655 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained; and WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Michael D, Neff, and the Defendant and her counsel, Ezra Spilke, Esq., that: 1, As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $109,655 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant. 2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant TATIANA DANIEL, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith. 3, All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York, Attn; Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew’s Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant’s name and case number. 4, The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property. 5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment. 6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney’s Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas. " 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Case4:21-cr-00729-LAK. Document 64 Filed 12/21/22 Page 4 of 4 8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. AGREED AND CONSENTED TO: DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Michael D, Neff 4” DATE Assistant United States Attorney US. Attorney’s Office, SDNY 1 St. Andrew’s Plaza New York, NY 10007 (212) 637-2107 TATIANA DANIEL TATIANA DANIEL DATE EZRA SPILKE, ESQ. DATE Attorney for Defendant Law Offices of Ezra Spilke, PLLC 1825 Foster Avenue Suite 1K Brooklyn, NY 11230 (718) 783-3682 DATE THE RABLE LEWIS A. KAPLAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
File and source
- File
- 64.pdf
- Size
- 124,026 bytes
- SHA-256
- ce4b31acef1bd7a98df4b0064580cb3ca0302089363f4b4a87dea0bc2ccefed0
- Our copy
- 64.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.