Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction — United States v. Shaneesha White (W.D.N.Y., Dkt. 52)

Summary

Form AO 247, Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), in United States v. Shaneesha White, Case 1:21-cr-00119-LJV, Document 52, filed May 22, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. The added text states that the defendant's criminal history category remains VI and that the defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction under Parts A and B, Subpart 1 of Guidelines Amendment 821. It denies any request to appoint counsel and states that the provisions of the judgment otherwise remain in effect.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:21-cr-00119-LJV Document 52 Filed 05/22/24 Page 1lof1

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU

for the

Western District of New York

United States of America

Vv. )
) Case No: 1:21CRO0119-001 | _ 7
Shaneesha White )
) USMNo: 35656-509 ee
Date of Original Judgment: August 18,2022) Oe

) Pro Se

Date of Previous Amended Judgment: ee
Defendant's Attorney

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [x] the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [_] the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
J] DENIED. [J GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to ;

(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

The defendant has a subtotal total of 17 criminal history points. Further, the defendant’s criminal history score under
subsections (a) through (d) total seven or more points and the defendant committed the instant offense under a criminal
justice sentence; therefore, one additional point is added. USSG §4A1.1(e). As such, the defendant’s criminal history
score is 18 rather than 19; however, she remains a criminal history category of VI. Consequently, she is not eligible for a
sentence reduction under Parts A and B, Subpart | of Guidelines Amendment 821.

Based on the foregoing, to the extent there has been a request to appoint counsel, it is denied.

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated __ August 18,2022 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

~ &
Order Date: 5-22 4

(if different from order date) Printed name and title


File and source

File

52.pdf

Size

608,657 bytes

SHA-256

bd0fbba53d0d2b0da4264191af4f57b971dce9171be273c4f40436170c2c811a

Our copy

52.pdf

Original

archive.org