Order Denying Defendant Oscar Thomas III's Motion to Suppress Evidence — United States v. Thomas (Dkt. 46)
Summary
An Order Denying Defendant Oscar Thomas III's Motion [34] to Suppress Evidence in United States of America v. Oscar Thomas III, No. 1:21-cr-14-HSO-RPM-1, Document 46, filed December 2, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division. The Court states that the motion was filed on October 22, 2021, and that it considered the arguments of counsel, the witness testimony and the relevant legal authorities at a hearing on December 2, 2021. For the reasons stated on the record at the conclusion of that hearing, the Court finds that the motion should be denied and orders it DENIED.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Denying Defendant Oscar Thomas III's Motion to Suppress Evidence — United States v. Thomas (Dkt. 46).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-21-cr-00014-dkt-46-s-d-miss-398115662d/
, SHA-256 9b045bcc5d8250c3bc503b1ea482f22836f5e2262a54556cc8246e584722d310.Full text
Case 1:21-cr-00014-HSO-RPM Document 46 Filed 12/02/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §
§
§
v. § 1:21-cr-14-HSO-RPM-1
§
§
OSCAR THOMAS III §
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT OSCAR THOMAS III’S MOTION [34] TO
SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
This matter came before the Court for hearing on the Motion to Suppress
Evidence [34] filed on October 22, 2021, by Defendant Oscar Thomas III in the
above-captioned case. After conducting a hearing on December 2, 2021, the Court
carefully considered the arguments of counsel, the witness testimony, and the
relevant legal authorities. For the reasons more fully stated on the record at the
conclusion of the hearing on December 2, 2021, the Court finds that Defendant’s
Motion should be denied.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Defendant’s
Motion to Suppress Evidence [34] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 2nd day of December, 2021.
s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
File and source
- File
- 46.pdf
- Size
- 86,447 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9b045bcc5d8250c3bc503b1ea482f22836f5e2262a54556cc8246e584722d310
- Our copy
- 46.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.