Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va., Dkt. 37)

Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va., Dkt. 37)

Summary

Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order in Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00658, Blue Flame Medical LLC against Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., John J. Brough, and David M. Evinger, in the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. Because the parties' Proposed Joint Discovery Plan addresses the matters for the initial pretrial conference, the order cancels the conference scheduled for September 30, 2020. All discovery is to be concluded by January 15, 2021, and the disclosures are to be completed by October 7, 2020. The order also sets motion filing, sealing and summary judgment procedures and requires proposed jury instructions and voir dire five (5) business days prior to trial. The page shows /s/ Ivan D. Davis, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va., Dkt. 37).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-20-cv-00658-dkt-37-e-d-va-23ad312b5e/, SHA-256 f5f9df196db51f22a26c014800c0544d4479914cf40cb34a11e1276db1457875.

Full text

Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD          Document 37        Filed 09/24/20       Page 1 of 6 PageID# 248




                          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
                                     Alexandria Division

  BLUE FLAME MEDICAL LLC,             )
                                      )
                                      )
                    Plaintiff,        )
                                      )
  v.                                  )            Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00658 (LMB/IDD)
                                      )
  CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A., JOHN J. )
  BROUGH, and DAVID M. EVINGER,       )
                                      )
                                      )
                    Defendants.       )
  ___________________________________ )

                              RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING ORDER

         Because the parties’ Proposed Joint Discovery Plan [Dkt. No. 36] adequately addresses

  the matters that would be discussed during the initial pretrial conference and counsel consent to

  waiving their appearances at the initial pretrial conference, the initial pretrial conference

  scheduled for September 30, 2020, pursuant to Rule 16(b) and this Court’s September 9, 2020,

  Order, is cancelled. Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their

  Proposed Joint Discovery Plan, the Court makes the following rulings:

         1.      All discovery shall be concluded by January 15, 2021.

         2.      Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) and (2), notices of depositions,

  interrogatories, requests for documents and admissions, and answers thereto shall not be

  filed except on order of the court, or for use in a motion or at trial.

         3.      No “general objection” may be asserted in response to any discovery demand

  except to preserve the attorney-client privilege and work product protection.

                                                  1
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 37        Filed 09/24/20     Page 2 of 6 PageID# 249




         4.      Any modifications to this Order, including deadlines of expert disclosures, require

  the parties to seek leave of Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b).

         5.      The parties’ Joint Discovery Plan is approved and shall control discovery to the

  extent of its application unless further modified by the Court.

         6.      All Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) disclosures shall be completed by October 7, 2020.

         7.      Any motion to amend the pleadings or to join a party shall be made as soon as

  possible after counsel or the party becomes aware of the grounds for the motion.

         8.      Expert disclosures shall be governed by the schedule set forth in paragraph 5 of

  the parties’ Proposed Joint Discovery Plan.

         9.      To the extent either party intends to assert a claim of privilege or protection as

  trial preparation material, any such claim must be made in a timely manner and in accordance

  with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5).

         10.     The following provisions shall apply to the filing and noticing of all motions:

                 a. Any motion to file a document under seal must comply with Local Civil Rule

                     5. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5, a notice specifically identifying the motion

                     as a sealing motion must be filed on the public record. There is no need to file

                     a notice of hearing for a motion to seal. A memorandum must be filed stating

                     sufficient facts to support the action sought, and a proposed order must

                     include specific findings. Where a party moves to file material under seal

                     because the opposing party has designated that material as confidential, the

                     opposing party must file a response to the motion and a proposed order that

                     meet the requirements of Local Civil Rule 5. Only the particular material

                                                   2
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD     Document 37        Filed 09/24/20      Page 3 of 6 PageID# 250




                found to meet the required standard may be sealed, with the remainder filed in

                the public record. An unsealed, redacted version of the filing in issue shall be

                filed with the motion to seal.       Filings under seal are disfavored and

                discouraged. See Va. Dep’t of State Police v. Washington Post, 386 F.3d 567,

                575–76 (4th Cir. 2004).

             b. All motions must contain a statement that a good-faith effort to narrow the

                area of disagreement has been made in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7(E)

                and Local Civil Rule 37(E) for discovery motions. All motions must adhere

                to the page limits and font requirements set in Local Civil Rule 7(F)(3). An

                appropriate number of paper copies of any motion and all pleadings relating to

                that motion shall be delivered directly to the attention of the judge at the

                Clerk’s Office within one day of the electronic filing.        See “Civil and

                Criminal Motions Procedures and other Alexandria Specific Information” on

                the Alexandria page of the Court’s website located at www.vaed.uscourts.gov.

             c. All motions, except for summary judgment and consent motions, shall be

                noticed for a hearing on the earliest possible Friday before the final pretrial

                conference consistent with the briefing schedules discussed below. A consent

                motion should be filed in accordance with the procedures provided on the

                Alexandria page of the Court’s website referenced above. Any motion to

                amend the pleadings or to join a party must be made as soon as possible after

                counsel or the party becomes aware of the grounds for the motion.



                                             3
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD      Document 37        Filed 09/24/20        Page 4 of 6 PageID# 251




             d. Dispositive motions and motions for patent claim construction shall be filed

                and briefed in accordance with the schedule set forth in Local Civil Rule

                7(F)(1) and (K). Local Civil Rule 7(F)(1) provides that a response brief is due

                14 days after service of the motion and a reply brief may be filed 6 days after

                the service of the response. The periods for filing a response brief and a reply

                shall apply without regard to the mode of service used for those briefs. Any

                dispositive motion against a pro se party must contain the notice set forth in

                Local Civil Rule 7(K) and provide the pro se party with at least 21 days to file

                a response opposing the motion.

             e. All Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 issues shall be raised in one pleading unless leave of

                court is first obtained. All summary judgment issues shall be presented in the

                same pleading unless leave of court is first obtained.

             f. All summary judgment issues shall be presented in the same pleading unless

                leave of court is first obtained. As required by Local Civil Rule 56, each brief

                in support of a motion for summary judgment must include a separately

                captioned section within the brief listing, in numbered-paragraph form, each

                material fact that the movant contends is undisputed with appropriate citations

                to the record. A brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment must

                include a separately captioned section within the brief addressing, in

                numbered-paragraph form corresponding to the movant’s section, each of the

                movant’s enumerated facts and indicating whether the non-movant admits or

                disputes the fact with appropriate citations to the record. The Court may

                                              4
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD      Document 37        Filed 09/24/20      Page 5 of 6 PageID# 252




                assume that any fact identified by the movant as undisputed in the movant’s

                brief that is not specifically controverted in the non-movant’s brief in the

                manner set forth above is admitted for the purpose of deciding the motion for

                summary judgment.

             g. In order to provide for the prompt resolution of non-dispositive matters, a

                non-dispositive motion may be filed by no later than 5:00 p.m. on a Friday

                and noticed for a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on the following Friday. Under this

                expedited schedule, a response brief must be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on

                the following Wednesday and any reply brief should be filed as early as

                possible on Thursday to give the court time to review all pleadings before the

                hearing. This expedited schedule shall apply for non-dispositive motions

                noticed for a hearing with less than two weeks’ notice. If a non-dispositive

                motion is noticed for a hearing between two and three weeks from the filing

                date, any response brief must be filed 7 days after service and any reply brief

                may be filed 3 days after service of the response. At the moving party’s

                discretion, a non-dispositive motion may also be filed and noticed for a

                hearing with three weeks’ notice and the briefing schedule provided in Local

                Civil Rule 7(F)(1) providing for 14 days for a response brief and 6 days for a

                reply would apply. If a non-dispositive motion is filed and oral argument is

                waived, any response brief must be filed within 7 days after service and any

                reply brief within 3 days after service of the response.



                                              5
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 37         Filed 09/24/20      Page 6 of 6 PageID# 253




         11.     In the event this case is tried before a jury, each party shall file their proposed jury

  instructions and voir dire five (5) business days prior to trial in accordance with Local Civil Rule

  51. Violation of this Rule will constitute a waiver of objections to any instructions given. In the

  event the case is tried without a jury, counsel shall file written proposed findings of fact and

  conclusions of law prior to the beginning of trial.

         Entered this 24th day of September 2020.

                                                                  /s/ Ivan D. Davis
                                                                 Ivan D. Davis
                                                                 United States Magistrate Judge

  Alexandria, Virginia




                                                    6


File and source

File
37.pdf
Size
67,900 bytes
SHA-256
f5f9df196db51f22a26c014800c0544d4479914cf40cb34a11e1276db1457875
Our copy
37.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top