Order — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., et al. (E.D. Va., Dkt. 212, filed 12/07/21)

Summary

This is an Order of the Eastern District of Virginia, Document 212, filed 12/07/21 in Case 1:20-cv-658, signed by Leonie M. Brinkema. It addresses the motions to seal of JPMorgan Chase Bank and Chain Bridge Bank that were earlier put in abeyance by the Order dated December 1, 2021. The Court says Chain Bridge publicly filed its attorney fee invoices on December 6, 2021 with redactions limited to information barred from disclosure by federal banking laws or that could prejudice Chain Bridge. It denies the motions to seal and orders the parties to refile their briefs on the public record without redactions.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD Document 212 Filed 12/07/21 Page 1 of 2 PagelD#
5618

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
BLUE FLAME MEDICAL LLC,
Plaintiff,
Vv.
CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A., et al.,

Defendants. 1:20-cv-658 (LMB/IDD)

CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A.,
Third Party Plaintiff,
V.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Third Party Defendant.

ORDER
Before the Court are third-party defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s (“JPMorgan”)
Motion to Seal [Dkt. No. 199], and Chain Bridge Bank, N.A.’s (“Chain Bridge”) Motion to Seal
[Dkt. No. 205], which were previously held in abeyance by the Court’s Order dated December 1,
2021. That Order required Chain Bridge to publicly file the attorney fee invoices with far more
limited redactions. Pursuant to that Order, on December 6, 2021 Chain Bridge filed its attorney
fee invoices publicly with redactions appropriately limited to that information which is

prohibited from disclosure by federal banking laws and that information which could prejudice
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD Document 21 Filed 12/07/21 Page 2 of 2 PagelD#
Chain Bridge if disclosed to third-party defendant JPMorgan in the parties’ ongoing appeal. At
this time, the Court does not need to conduct an in-camera review of the remaining redactions.

Because the information previously sought to be redacted from the parties’ briefs is now
all part of the public record, the parties’ pending motions to seal [Dkt. Nos. 199, 205] be and are
DENIED; and it is hereby

ORDERED that the parties refile their briefs [Dkt. Nos. 203, 209] on the public record
without any redactions.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to counsel of record.

Leonie M. Brinkema
United States District Judge

Entered this '] “day of December, 2021.

Alexandria, Virginia


File and source

File

212.pdf

Size

72,064 bytes

SHA-256

0e010b4b0248f290635a608cf3619c2a48126cdd13e4ea71b3bebfe269946c43

Our copy

212.pdf

Original

No public link identified.