Order — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., et al. (E.D. Va., Dkt. 176)

Summary

This is the Order entered September 23, 2021 by the Eastern District of Virginia in Case 1:20-cv-658, issued with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. It grants the defendants' motion for summary judgment against Blue Flame Medical, LLC and Chain Bridge's motion against third-party defendant JPMorgan as to liability for attorneys' fees and expenses. It denies Blue Flame's motions and JPMorgan's motion, and enters judgment for the defendants on the complaint and for Chain Bridge on its third-party complaint. If the fees amount is not resolved within 14 days, counsel must submit a proposed briefing schedule.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD Document176- Filed 09/23/21 Page 1 of 2 PagelD#
4425

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division

BLUE FLAME MEDICAL LLC,
Plaintiff,

v.

CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A., et al.,

Defendants. 1:20-cv-658 (LMB/IDD)

CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A.,
Third Party Plaintiff,
V.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Third Party Defendant.

ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment against plaintiff, Blue Flame Medical, LLC (“Blue Flame”) [Dkt. No.
118], and Chain Bridge Bank, N.A.’s (“Chain Bridge”) Motion for Summary Judgment against
Third-Party Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) as to liability for attorneys’
fees and expenses [Dkt. No. 122] are GRANTED; Blue Flame’s Motion for Partial Summary

Judgment [Dkt. No. 127] and Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authorities [Dkt. No. 170]
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD Pocument ire Filed 09/23/21 Page 2 of 2 PagelD#
are DENIED; Third-Party defendant JPMorgan’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Chain
Bridge [Dkt. No. 112] is DENIED; and it is hereby
ORDERED that judgment be and is entered in favor of defendants as to the claims in
Blue Flame’s complaint and in favor of Chain Bridge as to Chain Bridge’s third-party complaint
against JPMorgan; and it is further
ORDERED that if counsel for Chain Bridge and JPMorgan are unable to resolve within
14 days the amount of attorney’s fees and expenses to be awarded to Chain Bridge, they submit a
proposed schedule for briefing the issue.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to counsel of record and to enter

judgment in defendants’ favor pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 only as to the complaint.

Leonie M. Brinke:na
United Siates District Judge

ad
Entered this 23 day of September, 2021.

Alexandria, Virginia


File and source

File

176.pdf

Size

75,616 bytes

SHA-256

ce34327cef60880f22ab90018bd4d3550ae0aadbbeb7b0e784f1c78011fc8504

Our copy

176.pdf

Original

No public link identified.