Factual Basis for a Guilty Plea — United States v. David Christopher Redfern (Dkt. 87, September 22, 2021)
Summary
Factual Basis for a Guilty Plea filed by the United States in United States v. David Christopher Redfern, No. 1:20-cr-00340-WO, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, Document 87, dated September 22, 2021. After background on the CARES Act, PPP and EIDL, it states that from at least in or around May 2020 into June 2020 Redfern, Joseph Marsell Cartlidge, Eric Alexander McMiller, Jesse Kendall Griffin and others conspired to submit false PPP applications. It states that Redfern caused a PPP application seeking $410,322, in the name of Wilder Effects LLC, and that Redfern, Cartlidge, McMiller and Griffin collectively sought approximately $2,326,874 in PPP funds. It also states that Redfern sought two EIDLs in the name of Wilder Effects and that the second application was denied.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Factual Basis for a Guilty Plea — United States v. David Christopher Redfern (Dkt. 87, September 22, 2021).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-1-20-cr-00340-dkt-87-53df882402/
, SHA-256 9612011c8d5260e7d4bf0bfac2d43f771e4ed623d2f638b58eebdc1c5d6270e2.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
:
v. : 1:20CR 340-1
:
DAVID CHRISTOPHER REDFERN :
FACTUAL BASIS FOR A GUILTY PLEA
NOW COME the United States of America, by and through Sandra J.
Hairston, Acting United States Attorney for the Middle District of North
Carolina, and Joseph S. Beemsterboer, Acting Chief, Criminal Division, Fraud
Section, and state that the factual basis for a guilty plea is as follows:
Background
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
(“CARES”) Act was signed into law in response to the economic fallout of the
COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. One source of relief provided by the
CARES Act was the authorization of up to $349 billion in forgivable loans to
small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses, through a
program referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). In or around
April 2020, Congress authorized over $300 billion in additional PPP funding.
1
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 1 of 9
In order to obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business was required to
submit a PPP loan application, which was signed by an authorized
representative of the business. The PPP loan application required the business
(through its authorized representative) to acknowledge the program rules and
make certain affirmative certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP
loan. In the PPP loan application, the small business (through its authorized
representative) was required to state, among other things, its: (i) average
monthly payroll expenses; and (ii) number of employees. These figures were
used to calculate the amount of money the small business was eligible to
receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan were
required to provide documentation showing their payroll expenses.
PPP loan proceeds were required to be used by the business on certain
permissible expenses: payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities.
The PPP allowed the interest and principal on the PPP loan to be entirely
forgiven if the business spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within
a designated period of time after receiving the proceeds and used a certain
amount of the PPP loan proceeds on payroll expenses.
Another source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the expansion
of the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program administered by the
United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”), an agency of the
2
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 2 of 9
executive branch of the United States Government. Specifically, the CARES
Act authorized the SBA to provide EIDLs of up to $2 million to eligible small
businesses experiencing financial disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The CARES Act also authorized the SBA to issue advances of up to $10,000 to
small businesses within three days of applying for an EIDL. The amount of
the advance was determined by the number of employees the applicant
certified having. The advances did not have to be repaid.
In order to obtain an EIDL and advance, a qualifying business was
required to submit an application to the SBA and provide information about
its operations, such as the number of employees, gross revenues for the 12-
month period preceding the disaster, and cost of goods sold in the 12-month
period preceding the disaster. The applicant was also required to certify that
all of the information in the application is true and correct to the best of the
applicant’s knowledge. EIDL funds were permitted to be used for payroll
expenses, sick leave, production costs, and business obligations, such as debts,
rent, and mortgage payments.
PPP Conspiracy and Scheme to Defraud
From at least in or around May 2020, continuing up to and including in
or around June 2020, the defendant, DAVID CHRISTOPHER REDFERN,
Joseph Marsell Cartlidge, Eric Alexander McMiller, Jesse Kendall Griffin, and
3
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 3 of 9
others knowingly and intentionally conspired to devise a scheme to defraud
and to obtain money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent
pretenses, representations, and promises, by submitting and causing to be
submitted false and fraudulent loan applications in order to obtain funds
through the PPP.
During the course of the investigation, investigators interviewed a
confidential human source (“CHS 1”) regarding CHS 1’s involvement in the
PPP scheme. CHS 1 told investigators that CHS 1 used intermediaries to
recruit individuals to apply for false and fraudulent PPP loans and, in return
for preparing PPP loan application documentation for such individuals, sought
a portion of the fraudulently obtained loan proceeds. One such intermediary
recruited REDFERN into the scheme and conspiracy, who in turn connected
the intermediary to Cartlidge, McMiller, and Griffin. REDFERN, Cartlidge,
McMiller, and Griffin each communicated with CHS 1 through one or more
intermediaries and agreed to participate in the scheme and conspiracy.
REDFERN, Cartlidge, McMiller, and Griffin each utilized registered
businesses and claimed false business operations in furtherance of the fraud
scheme. REDFERN, Cartlidge, McMiller, and Griffin also utilized or
attempted to utilize business and personal bank accounts at various financial
institutions for the purpose of receiving fraudulent loan proceeds. In
4
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 4 of 9
furtherance of the scheme, REDFERN, Cartlidge, McMiller, and Griffin
provided information, including personal and business identifying
information, to CHS 1 through one or more intermediaries in order to seek PPP
loans. CHS 1 then used such information to prepare and cause to be prepared
false and fraudulent supporting documentation, including bank account
statements and tax filings, for PPP applications on behalf of REDFERN,
Cartlidge, McMiller, and Griffin.
During the course of the conspiracy, REDFERN, in the Middle District
of North Carolina, caused the submission of one fraudulent PPP application.
Specifically, on or about June 1, 2020, REDFERN caused the submission of a
PPP application seeking a loan in the amount of $410,322 in the name of
Wilder Effects LLC (“Wilder Effects”), a company that was registered with the
North Carolina Secretary of State on or about January 17, 2020 and listed
REDFERN as the registered agent and owner. The registered business
address for Wilder Effects was in Trinity, North Carolina. Prior to the
submission of the Wilder Effects PPP application, on or about January 23,
2020, REDFERN opened a business account at bank branch located in High
Point, North Carolina in the name of Wilder Effects (“Wilder Effects Account
1”), over which REDFERN had sole signatory authority.
5
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 5 of 9
In the Wilder Effects PPP application, REDFERN falsely affirmed or
caused to be affirmed, among other information, that Wilder Effects had
twenty employees and an average monthly payroll of $164,129. The Wilder
Effects PPP application appended as supporting documentation: (i) a false and
fraudulent purported IRS Form 941 for the first quarter of 2020 showing
$492,389.01 paid in wages to twenty employees; and (ii) a false and fraudulent
bank statement for Wilder Effects dated February 27, 2020, showing a balance
of $290,028.70.
As a result of this false and fraudulent PPP application, REDFERN
caused the disbursement by interstate wire transfer, on or about June 2, 2020,
of $410,322 in loan funds owned by, or under the custody and control of, a
financial institution. Upon receiving the PPP funds in Wilder Account 1,
REDFERN subsequently transferred, caused to be transferred, and attempted
to transfer fraudulently obtained PPP loan proceeds to accounts under his co-
defendant’s and CHS 1’s control, and used PPP loan proceeds for his personal
benefit, and for the benefit of others. Specifically, that same day, REDFERN
attempted to wire from Wilder Effects Account 1 (i) $102,580 to an account in
Florida controlled by CHS 1; and (ii) $30,000 to an account controlled by
Griffin. REDFERN attempted the $102,580 wire transfer in person at a bank
branch located in Greensboro, North Carolina. The next day, on or about June
6
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 6 of 9
3, 2020, an $8,000 counter check written to “cash” was withdrawn from Wilder
Effects Account 1 at a second bank branch located in Greensboro, North
Carolina.
Over the course of the conspiracy, REDFERN, Cartlidge, McMiller, and
Griffin collectively sought to fraudulently obtain approximately $2,326,874 in
PPP funds. All of the relevant disbursements and subsequent transfers were
made by means of interstate wire to bank accounts controlled by REDFERN
and his co-defendants.
EIDL Scheme to Defraud
REDFERN also devised a scheme to defraud by submitting and causing
to be submitted false and fraudulent loan applications to the SBA in order to
obtain funds through the EIDL program. In particular, in or around April and
May 2020, REDFERN fraudulently sought two EIDLs in the name of Wilder
Effects, on or about April 12, 2020 and May 17, 2020, respectively. As a result
of the first false and fraudulent EIDL application, REDFERN caused the
disbursement by interstate wire transfer, on or about May 5, 2020, of $2,000
in EIDL advance funds from the SBA to Wilder Effects Account 1. On or about
June 2, 2020, REDFERN opened a second business account in the name of
Wilder Effects (“Wilder Effects Account 2”), over which REDFERN had sole
signatory authority. Also, in connection with the first false and fraudulent
7
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 7 of 9
EIDL application, REDFERN caused the disbursement by interstate wire
transfer, on or about June 18, 2020, of $2,000 in EIDL funds to Wilder Effects
Account 2. The second false and fraudulent EIDL application was denied.
This the 22nd day of September, 2021.
Respectfully submitted,
SANDRA J. HAIRSTON
Acting United States Attorney
/S/ NICOLE R. DUPRE
Assistant United States Attorney
NCSB: 41214
United States Attorney’s Office
Middle District of North Carolina
101 S. Edgeworth Street, 4th Floor
Greensboro, NC 27401
Phone: 336/333-5351
JOSEPH BEEMSTERBOER
Acting Chief, Fraud Section
United States Department of Justice
Criminal Division
/S/ JESSEE ALEXANDER-HOEPPNER
NYSB #4871406
Trial Attorney
8
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 8 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
:
v. : 1:20CR 340-1
:
DAVID CHRISTOPHER REDFERN :
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on September 22, 2021, I electronically filed the
foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will
send notification of such filing to the following: Thomas King, Esq.
Respectfully submitted,
SANDRA J. HAIRSTON
Acting United States Attorney
/S/ NICOLE R. DUPRE
Assistant United States Attorney
NCSB: 41214
United States Attorney’s Office
Middle District of North Carolina
101 S. Edgeworth Street, 4th Floor
Greensboro, NC 27401
Phone: 336/333-5351
Case 1:20-cr-00340-WO Document 87 Filed 09/22/21 Page 9 of 9
File and source
- File
- 87.pdf
- Size
- 83,880 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9612011c8d5260e7d4bf0bfac2d43f771e4ed623d2f638b58eebdc1c5d6270e2
- Our copy
- 87.pdf
- Original
- archive.org