Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home First Amended Complaint — MAG Enterprises v. SBA (E.D. Pa.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

First Amended Complaint — MAG Enterprises v. SBA (E.D. Pa.)

Summary

The plaintiffs' first amended complaint, filed July 26, 2021 as Document 29 in MAG Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Small Business Administration, Case No. 5:21-cv-02213-EGS, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs, including MAG Enterprises, Inc. and Kimmico, Inc., sue the SBA, its Administrator and the United States over the Restaurant Revitalization Fund, 15 U.S.C. § 9009c. The complaint challenges the SBA's definition of "affiliated business" in its Program Guide as of April 28, 2021, its use of 13 C.F.R. § 120.110 as eligibility criteria, and training slides that purportedly require applicants to withdraw pending Paycheck Protection Program applications. It asks the court to declare those provisions unlawful, enjoin them, restore the plaintiffs' place in the application queue and award fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 389 KB

Original: ecf.paed.uscourts.gov

Record facts

File name29-major-prep-tsv-rank-121.pdf
SHA-2568b025018590877575159b2d066d54656e1b9eadc923325a5e8b46324a95ca3da
Size397,851 bytes
Source siteecf.paed.uscourts.gov

File and source

File
29-major-prep-tsv-rank-121.pdf
Size
397,851 bytes
SHA-256
8b025018590877575159b2d066d54656e1b9eadc923325a5e8b46324a95ca3da
Our copy
29-major-prep-tsv-rank-121.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top