Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Court filing — E.D. Cal. No. 2:25-cr-00038 (Dkt. 26, E.D. Cal.)

Court filing — E.D. Cal. No. 2:25-cr-00038 (Dkt. 26, E.D. Cal.)

Full text

     Case 2:25-cr-00038-DJC          Document 26        Filed 05/16/25      Page 1 of 3


1    HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, #122664
     Federal Defender
2    DOUGLAS BEEVERS, #288639
     Assistant Federal Defender
3    801 I Street, 3rd Floor
     Sacramento, CA 95814
4    Tel: (916) 498-5700
     Fax: (916) 498-5710
5    Douglas_Beevers@fd.org
6    Attorney for Defendant
     AKASH SINGH
7
                              IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
                           FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                   )   Case No. 2:25-CR-0038-DJC
                                                 )
11   Plaintiff,                                  )   STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
                                                 )   STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE
12   vs.                                         )   TIME
                                                 )
13   AKASH SINGH,                                )    Date: May 22, 2025
                                                 )   Time: 9:00 a.m.
14   Defendant.                                  )   Judge: Daniel J. Calabretta
                                                 )
15                                               )
16          IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between Acting United States
17   Attorney Michele Beckwith, through Assistant United States Samuel Stefanki, counsel for
18   Plaintiff, and Federal Defender Heather Williams, through Assistant Federal Defender Assistant

19   Federal Defender Douglas Beevers, attorney for Akash Singh, that the status conference,

20   currently scheduled for May 22, 2025, be continued to June 12, 2025 at 9:00 a.m.

21          Defense counsel requests additional time to review new discovery received this week and

22   conduct investigation in this case. Defense counsel was in a speedy trial in the beginning of May

23   which occupied substantial time. The parties believe a continuance to June 12, 2025, will permit

24   defense counsel the additional time necessary to conduct pretrial investigation, identify and

25   interview witnesses, obtain pertinent records, and finalize any further pre-plea negotiations.

26          Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be
     excluded of this order’s date through and including June 12, 2025; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161
27
     (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4
28
     based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.
                                                      -1-
     Case 2:25-cr-00038-DJC          Document 26        Filed 05/16/25       Page 2 of 3


1           Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting
2    this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
3
4                                                  Respectfully submitted,
5
     Dated: May 15, 2025
6                                                  HEATHER E. WILLIAMS
                                                   Federal Defender
7
8                                                  /s/ Douglas Beevers
                                                   DOUGLAS BEEVERS
9                                                  Assistant Federal Defender
                                                   Attorney for Defendant
10                                                 AKASH SINGH
11   Dated: May 15, 2025
                                                   MICHELLE BECKWITH
12                                                 United States Attorney
13                                                 /s/ Samuel Stefanki
                                                   SAMUEL STEFANKI
14                                                 Assistant U.S. Attorney
                                                   Attorney for Plaintiff
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

                                                     -2-
     Case 2:25-cr-00038-DJC           Document 26        Filed 05/16/25      Page 3 of 3


1                                                  ORDER
2           IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties’
3    stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties’ stipulation in its entirety as
4    its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny
5    counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of
6    due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested
7    continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.
8           The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including June
9    12, 2025, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be
10   commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv)
11   [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further
12   ordered the May 22, 2025 status conference shall be continued until June 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m.
13
14   Dated: May 15, 2025                              /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta
                                                      THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA
15
                                                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

                                                      -3-


File and source

File
26.pdf
Size
131,777 bytes
SHA-256
c01acb0e6c880109cb044352519f367f66891e394940c99e69b3c5e0252de4c1
Our copy
26.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top