Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Stipulation Regarding Excludable Time Periods Under Speedy Trial Act; Findings and Order (E.D. Cal., Dkt. 135)

Stipulation Regarding Excludable Time Periods Under Speedy Trial Act; Findings and Order (E.D. Cal., Dkt. 135)

Summary

Stipulation regarding excludable time periods under the Speedy Trial Act, with findings and order, filed January 17, 2025 as Document 135 in United States v. Shahriar Loloee, Karla Montoya, Mirwais Shams and Ahmad Shams, Case No. 2:23-CR-00320-KJM, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. It recites that a hearing on the defendants' motions to suppress evidence took place on October 22, 2024 and the motions were taken under submission pending supplemental briefing that concluded on November 15, 2024. The parties ask to exclude time between January 6, 2025 and February 25, 2025 under Local Code T4, saying discovery is at least ten terabytes of data plus boxes of physical employment records and defense counsel has reviewed more than 5,000 pages. The order is dated the 17th day of January, 2025.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Stipulation Regarding Excludable Time Periods Under Speedy Trial Act; Findings and Order (E.D. Cal., Dkt. 135).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-e-d-cal-no-2-23-cr-00320-dkt-135-e-d-cal-8686c4e54c/, SHA-256 84b4eebf6dde22c9b253cf6bec9426321748739e1e9457b590fb1c626a817da9.

Full text

            Case 2:23-cr-00320-KJM             Document 135     Filed 01/17/25      Page 1 of 3


 1 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
   United States Attorney
 2 AUDREY HEMESATH
   MATTHEW THUESEN
 3 SAM STEFANKI
   Assistant United States Attorneys
 4 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
   Sacramento, CA 95814
 5 Telephone: (916) 554-2700

 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
   United States of America
 7

 8                               IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 9                                  EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10

11   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                           CASE NO. 2:23-CR-00320-KJM
12                                Plaintiff,             STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE
                                                         TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT;
13                          v.                           FINDINGS AND ORDER
14   SHAHRIAR “SEAN” LOLOEE,
     KARLA MONTOYA,
15   MIRWAIS SHAMS, and
     AHMAD “SHAH” SHAMS,
16

17                                Defendants.
18

19                                              STIPULATION

20          1.      On October 22, 2024, the Court held a hearing on the defendants’ motions to suppress

21 evidence. The Court did not set a further status conference on that date, nor did the parties seek to

22 exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act. The Court took the suppression motions under submission

23 pending filing of supplemental briefing, which concluded on November 15, 2024.

24          2.      By this stipulation, the parties now request that the Court enter an order excluding time

25 under the Speedy Trial Act between January 6, 2025, and February 25, 2025, under Local Code T4.

26          3.      The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

27                  a)     The discovery in this case consists of at least ten terabytes of data that was

28          previously produced to defense counsel on multiple hard drives. The discovery in this case also

      STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME              1
      PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
          Case 2:23-cr-00320-KJM           Document 135         Filed 01/17/25      Page 2 of 3


 1        includes dozens of boxes of physical employment records, which must be reviewed in person.

 2        All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for

 3        inspection and copying. To date, defense counsel has reviewed more than 5,000 pages of

 4        discovery and continues to do so.

 5                b)      Counsel for all defendants desire additional time to review produced discovery,

 6        conduct investigation and research relevant to the charges facing their clients, and otherwise

 7        prepare for trial. Counsel for all defendants believe that this process will take until at least the

 8        end of February.

 9                c)      Counsel for the defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested

10        continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into

11        account the exercise of due diligence.

12                d)      The government does not object to the continuance.

13                e)      Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the

14        case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the

15        original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

16                f)      For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161,

17        et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of January 6, 2025, to February 25,

18        2025, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code

19        T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendants’ request on the

20        basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the

21        best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

22 ///

23 ///

24 ///

25 ///

26 ///

27 ///

28 ///

     STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME               2
     PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
           Case 2:23-cr-00320-KJM          Document 135         Filed 01/17/25     Page 3 of 3


 1          4.     Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the

 2 Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial

 3 must commence.

 4          IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 5

 6   Dated: January 6, 2025                                  PHILLIP A. TALBERT
                                                             United States Attorney
 7

 8                                                           /s/ SAM STEFANKI
                                                             AUDREY HEMESATH
 9                                                           MATTHEW THUESEN
                                                             SAM STEFANKI
10                                                           Assistant United States Attorneys

11   Dated: January 6, 2025                                  /s/ SHERRY D.H. HAUS
                                                             SHERRY D.H. HAUS
12                                                           Counsel for Defendant SHAHRIAR LOLOEE
13   Dated: January 6, 2025                                  /s/ KEVIN JAMES ROONEY
                                                             KEVIN JAMES ROONEY
14                                                           Counsel for Defendant SHAHRIAR LOLOEE
15   Dated: January 6, 2025                                  /s/ THOMAS A. JOHNSON
                                                             THOMAS A. JOHNSON
16                                                           Counsel for Defendant SHAHRIAR LOLOEE
17   Dated: January 6, 2025                                  /s/ WILIAM J. PORTANOVA
                                                             WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA
18                                                           Counsel for Defendant KARLA MONTOYA
19   Dated: January 6, 2025                                  /s/ MICHAEL D. LONG
                                                             MICHAEL D. LONG
20                                                           Counsel for Defendant MIRWAIS SHAMS
21   Dated: January 6, 2025                                  /s/ TIMOTHY E. WARRINER
                                                             TIMOTHY E. WARRINER
22                                                           Counsel for Defendant AHMAD SHAMS
23 /////

24 /////

25 /////

26                                                   ORDER
27          IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED this 17th day of January, 2025.
28

      STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME              3
      PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT


File and source

File
135.pdf
Size
137,086 bytes
SHA-256
84b4eebf6dde22c9b253cf6bec9426321748739e1e9457b590fb1c626a817da9
Our copy
135.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top