Detention Order (Violation of Supervised Release) — United States v. Christina Smith (E.D. Cal., Dkt. 104)
Summary
Detention Order (Violation of Supervised Release), dated September 9, 2026 and filed as Document 104 in Case 1:20-cr-00253-DAD-BAM, United States of America v. Christina Smith, Eastern District of California. The order states that the defendant was arrested for alleged violations of the terms and conditions of supervised release. It orders the defendant detained and finds that the defendant has not met the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee and/or is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community. It states that the finding is based on the reasons stated on the record. The signature block names Stanley A. Boone, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Detention Order (Violation of Supervised Release) — United States v. Christina Smith (E.D. Cal., Dkt. 104).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-e-d-cal-no-1-20-cr-00253-dkt-104-e-d-cal-0806c91f3e/
, SHA-256 ec53ff5a93b1d53b99c8536ce5e372fe6ea67b7411424b4944d01152fd554777.Full text
Case 1:20-cr-00253-DAD-BAM Document 104 Filed 09/09/26 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20 CR 00253 DAD BAM
Plaintiff,
DETENTION ORDER
v. (Violation of Supervised Release)
CHRISTINA SMITH,
Defendant.
The defendant having been arrested for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of
supervised release; and
Having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.l(a)(6)
and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a), the Court orders the above-named defendant detained and finds that:
x The defendant has not met defendant’s burden of establishing by clear and convincing
evidence that defendant is not likely to flee; and/or
X The defendant has not met defendant’s burden of establishing by clear and convincing
evidence that defendant is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community
if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c).
This finding is based on the reasons stated on the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 9, 2026
STANLEY A. BOONE
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 104.pdf
- Size
- 187,227 bytes
- SHA-256
- ec53ff5a93b1d53b99c8536ce5e372fe6ea67b7411424b4944d01152fd554777
- Our copy
- 104.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.