Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (D. Nev., Dkt. 86)

Summary

An AO 247 Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in United States of America v. Darnele Nelson, Case No: 2:20-cr-00195-APG-EJY-1, Document 86, filed 06/26/24, in the District of Nevada. It gives the Date of Original Judgment as 08/03/2022 and lists Nisha Brooks-Whittington as the defendant's attorney. The form refers to a guideline sentencing range lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission and to policy statement USSG §1B1.10. Its options for the motion are denied or granted, and a grant would reduce the previously imposed term of imprisonment. The order date is 06/26/2024, with U.S. District Judge Andrew P. Gordon as the printed name and title.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 2:20-cr-00195-APG-EJY Document 86 Filed 06/26/24 Page 1 of1

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the
District of Nevada
United States of America )
Darnele Nelson aka Ricky Ellis aka Gamarmaurice ) Case No: 2:20-cr-00195-APG-EJY-1
Newson ) ;
) USMNo: 22445-055

Date of Original Judgment: 08/03/2022 y 7

Date of Previous Amended Judgment: ) Nisha Brooks-Whittington

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of VV] the defendant CJ the Director of the Bureau of Prisons C] the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
[VIDENIED. L_]GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) Of months is reduced to .
(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Order Date: 06/26/2024 G-
Judge’s signature
Effective Date: U.S. District Judge Andrew P. Gordon

(if different from order date) Printed name and title


File and source

File

86.pdf

Size

114,196 bytes

SHA-256

7afaf398c9ff5fe5e263790d1dea6521bd04a52063ac8a58ca5df8661b50c7dc

Our copy

86.pdf

Original

archive.org