Order on Motion for Records — Nathan Reardon v. United States (D. Me., Dkt. 295)
Summary
Order on Motion for Records, filed October 28, 2025 as Document 295, Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEW, Nathan Reardon v. United States of America, District of Maine. The Order states that Petitioner moves the Court to produce documents generated by or possessed by court personnel regarding his bail hearing in April 2022 (Motion for Records, ECF No. 284). It states that the judicial branch is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act and that Petitioner cites no relevant legal authority for the request. The Court denies the motion for records. It is signed /s/ John C. Nivison, U.S. Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order on Motion for Records — Nathan Reardon v. United States (D. Me., Dkt. 295).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-d-me-no-1-21-cr-00061-dkt-295-29a9e9ba29/
, SHA-256 c9eb5e775ba887330b304f04372aa354813afbf5acfe21565255e6e1a44ffdcb.Full text
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEW Document 295 Filed 10/28/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
1857
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
NATHAN REARDON, )
)
Petitioner )
)
v. ) 1:21-cr-00061-LEW
) 1:25-cv-00232-LEW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Respondent )
ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECORDS
Defendant/Petitioner (Petitioner) moves the Court to produce documents generated
by or possessed by court personnel regarding his bail hearing in April 2022. (Motion for
Records, ECF No. 284.) “The judicial branch is exempt from the Freedom of
Information Act,” United States v. Casas, 376 F.3d 20, 22 (1st Cir. 2004), and Petitioner
cites no relevant legal authority that would support his request. Petitioner’s general
reference to the Court’s “administrative authority” is unavailing. The Court discerns no
legal or factual basis to support Petitioner’s request. Accordingly, the Court denies
Petitioner’s motion for records.
NOTICE
Any objections to this Order shall be filed in accordance with Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 72 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59.
/s/ John C. Nivison
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Dated this 28th day of October, 2025.
File and source
- File
- 295.pdf
- Size
- 109,226 bytes
- SHA-256
- c9eb5e775ba887330b304f04372aa354813afbf5acfe21565255e6e1a44ffdcb
- Our copy
- 295.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.