Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Motion for Leave to File Surreply Concerning Motion to Recuse — United States v. Nathan Reardon (D. Me., Dkt. 261)

Motion for Leave to File Surreply Concerning Motion to Recuse — United States v. Nathan Reardon (D. Me., Dkt. 261)

Summary

Motion for Leave to File Surreply Concerning Motion to Recuse, filed June 3, 2025 as Document 261, Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEW, United States v. Nathan Reardon, District of Maine. The Government seeks leave to file a surreply to Defendant's "Revised Reply to Government's Opposition to Motion to Recuse" (Dkt. #259). It states that the Reply attributes a statement about public trust in the court process to the Court at the October 13, 2023 hearing, and that the statement was in fact made by the Government during its sentencing arguments, citing Dkt. #192. It is signed /s/ ANDREW K. LIZOTTE, AUSA.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Motion for Leave to File Surreply Concerning Motion to Recuse — United States v. Nathan Reardon (D. Me., Dkt. 261).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-d-me-no-1-21-cr-00061-dkt-261-fb4a6e5b0f/, SHA-256 92b1774acf7ac76750c94edb17208e95efbc9eee7bd0e4a095520711ab980b7d.

Full text

Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEW        Document 261 Filed 06/03/25          Page 1 of 3       PageID #:
                                        1673



                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             DISTRICT OF MAINE

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

        v.                                       No. 1:21-cr-00061-LEW

 NATHAN REARDON

                    MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY
                      CONCERNING MOTION TO RECUSE

       The Government, by and through undersigned counsel, seeks leave of the Court

to file a surreply to Defendant’s “Revised Reply to Government’s Opposition to Motion

to Recuse.” Dkt. #259, June 3, 2025 (the “Reply”). The Reply states, in part:

       In the October 13, 2023 hearing, Judge Walker made the following
       statement on the record:

       “There is people in the community who see this Court’s order, they read
       about it in the papers, and then they see him just doing it. It really does
       undercut the public’s trust in the court process.”

       This statement is a direct admission that media coverage shaped or
       reinforced the Court’s impressions of the Defendant’s conduct.

Reply at 1.

       The Government seeks leave to surreply to correct Defendant’s factual

misrepresentation that the above statement was made by the Court, when, in fact, the

statement was made by the Government during its sentencing arguments. See Dkt.

#192, Final Revocation Hr’g Tr. at 7:15-10:21 (Oct. 13, 2023).




                                             1
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEW   Document 261 Filed 06/03/25     Page 2 of 3     PageID #:
                                   1674




Dated: June 3, 2025                      Respectfully submitted,
      Bangor, Maine
                                         CRAIG M. WOLFF
                                         Acting United States Attorney

                                         /s/ ANDREW K. LIZOTTE
                                         Andrew K. Lizotte, AUSA
                                         United States Attorney’s Office
                                         202 Harlow Street
                                         Bangor, Maine 04401
                                         (207) 262-4636
                                         Andrew.Lizotte@usdoj.gov




                                     2
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEW        Document 261 Filed 06/03/25          Page 3 of 3    PageID #:
                                        1675




                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
       I hereby certify that on June 3, 2025, I electronically filed the foregoing with the
Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and caused a copy via first-class mail to be
sent to the following:
                    Nathan Reardon, P.O. Box 52, Detroit, ME 04929

                                          CRAIG M. WOLFF
                                          Acting United States Attorney

                                           /s/ ANDREW K. LIZOTTE
                                          Andrew K. Lizotte, AUSA
                                          United States Attorney’s Office
                                          202 Harlow Street
                                          Bangor, Maine 04401
                                          (207) 262-4636
                                          Andrew.Lizotte@usdoj.gov




                                             3

File and source

File
261.pdf
Size
96,569 bytes
SHA-256
92b1774acf7ac76750c94edb17208e95efbc9eee7bd0e4a095520711ab980b7d
Our copy
261.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top