Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Court filing — C.D. Cal. No. 2:22-cr-00205 (Dkt. 32, C.D. Cal.)

Court filing — C.D. Cal. No. 2:22-cr-00205 (Dkt. 32, C.D. Cal.)

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 32 Filed 05/12/22 Pagelof2 Page D#444

( ResetForm | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cm ILED
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5/10/2029
CASE SUMMARY CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case Number 2:22-cr-00205-JEFW

U.S.A. v.. CARLEISHA NEOSHA PLUMMER

Indictment [_] Information

Defendant Number 2
Year of Birth 1990

Investigative agency (FBI, DEA, etc.) HSI

NOTE: All items MUST be completed. If you do not know the answer or a question is not applicable to your case, enter "N/A."

OFFENSE/VENUE

a. Offense charged as a:

[_] Class A Misdemeanor [_] Minor Offense [_] Petty Offense
[_] Class B Misdemeanor [_] Class C Misdemeanor [y] Felony
b. Date of Offense

c. County in which first offense occurred

Los Angeles ~

d. The crimes charged are alleged to have been committed in
(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):

Los Angeles
[_] Orange
Riverside

San Bernardino

Ventura
[_] Santa Barbara

[_] San Luis Obispo
[_] Other

Citation of Offense 18 USC 1349, 1344(2), 1028A(a)(1)

e. Division in which the MAJORITY of events, acts, or omissions
giving rise to the crime or crimes charged occurred:

Western (Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura)
[_] Eastern (Riverside and San Bernardino) [_] Southern (Orange)

RELATED CASE

Has an indictment or information involving this defendant and
the same transaction or series of transactions been previously
filed and dismissed before trial?

No [_] Yes

If "Yes," Case Number:

Pursuant to General Order 21-01, criminal cases may be related
if a previously filed indictment or information and the present
case:

a. arise out of the same conspiracy, common scheme,
transaction, series of transactions or events; or

b. involve one or more defendants in common, and would
entail substantial duplication of labor in pretrial, trial or
sentencing proceedings if heard by different judges.

Related case(s), if any (MUST MATCH NOTICE OF RELATED

CASE):

PREVIOUSLY FILED COMPLAINT/CVB CITATION
A complaint/CVB citation was previously filed on: 4/27/22

MJ 22-1656

Case Number:

Assigned Judge: Hon. Gail J. Standish

Charging: Wire fraud conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1349)
The complaint/CVB citation:

is still pending

[_] was dismissed on:

PREVIOUS COUNSEL
Was defendant previously represented?

No [_] Yes

IF YES, provide Name:

Phone Number:

COMPLEX CASE
Are there 8 or more defendants in the Indictment/Information?

Yes* [_] No

Will more than 12 days be required to present government's
evidence in the case-in-chief?

Yes* [_] No

*AN ORIGINAL AND 1 COPY (UNLESS ELECTRONICALLY FILED)
OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLEX CASE MUST BE FILED AT THE
TIME THE INDICTMENT IS FILED IF EITHER "YES" BOX IS
CHECKED.

SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT/INFORMATION
IS THIS ANEW DEFENDANT? [_] Yes [_] No

superseding charge (i.e., 1st, 2nd).

This is the
The superseding case was previously filed on:

Case Number

The superseded case:
[_] is still pending before Judge/Magistrate Judge

L] was previously dismissed on

Are there 8 or more defendants in the superseding case?

[_] Yes* [_] No
Will more than 12 days be required to present government's
evidence in the case-in-chief?

[_] Yes* [|] No
Was a Notice of Complex Case filed on the Indictment or
Information?
[_] No

[_] Yes
*AN ORIGINAL AND 1 COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLEX CASE
MUST BE FILED AT THE TIME THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT IS
FILED IF EITHER "YES" BOX IS CHECKED.

CR-72 (03/21)

CASE SUMMARY

Page 1 of 2
Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 32 Filed 05/12/22 Page 2of2 Page ID#:148
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE SUMMARY

INTERPRETER
Is an interpreter required? [_] YES NO
IF YES, list language and/or dialect:

CUSTODY STATUS

OTHER

[_] Male Female
U.S. Citizen [_] Alien
Alias Name(s) LG

This defendant is charged in:
[_] All counts

Only counts: 1, 18, 29, 31,34

[_] This defendant is designated as "High Risk" per
18 USC § 3146(a)(2) by the U.S. Attorney.

[_] This defendant is designated as "Special Case" per
18 USC § 3166(b)(7).

[_] Yes No
IF YES, should matter be sealed? [_] Yes No

Is defendant a juvenile?

The area(s) of substantive law that will be involved in this case
include(s):

financial institution fraud [_] public corruption

government fraud [_] tax offenses
mail/wire fraud

[_] immigration offenses

[_] environmental issues
[_] narcotics offenses

[_] violent crimes/firearms

Other Identity theft

[_] corporate fraud

Defendant is not in custody:
a. Date and time of arrest on complaint:

b, Posted bond at complaint level on:

in the amount of $

c.PSA supervision? [_] Yes [_]No
d. Is on bail or release from another district:

Defendant is in custody:
a. Place of incarceration: [_] State [_] Federal

b. Name of Institution:

c. If Federal, U.S. Marshals Service Registration Number:

d.[_] Solely on this charge. Date and time of arrest:

e. On another conviction: [] Yes [_] No

[_] Federal

f. Awaiting trial on other charges: LE] Yes L] No
IFYES: [] State [] Federal AND

Name of Court:

IFYES: [_] State

[_] Writ of Issue

Date transferred to federal custody:

This person/proceeding is transferred from another district
pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 20 21 40

EXCLUDABLE TIME

Determinations as to excludable time prior to filing indictment/information. EXPLAIN:

Date 05/09/2022

Zz

Signature of Assistant U.S. Attorney

Gregory Bernstein
Print Name

CR-72 (03/21)

CASE SUMMARY

Page 2 of 2


File and source

File
32.pdf
Size
3,046,295 bytes
SHA-256
5f4e37608370f1bea5e90f1316217c2c879238a56c9583785a55bbb955365ada
Our copy
32.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top