Court filing — C.D. Cal. No. 2:22-cr-00205 (Dkt. 32, C.D. Cal.)
Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 32 Filed 05/12/22 Pagelof2 Page D#444 ( ResetForm | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cm ILED CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5/10/2029 CASE SUMMARY CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case Number 2:22-cr-00205-JEFW U.S.A. v.. CARLEISHA NEOSHA PLUMMER Indictment [_] Information Defendant Number 2 Year of Birth 1990 Investigative agency (FBI, DEA, etc.) HSI NOTE: All items MUST be completed. If you do not know the answer or a question is not applicable to your case, enter "N/A." OFFENSE/VENUE a. Offense charged as a: [_] Class A Misdemeanor [_] Minor Offense [_] Petty Offense [_] Class B Misdemeanor [_] Class C Misdemeanor [y] Felony b. Date of Offense c. County in which first offense occurred Los Angeles ~ d. The crimes charged are alleged to have been committed in (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Los Angeles [_] Orange Riverside San Bernardino Ventura [_] Santa Barbara [_] San Luis Obispo [_] Other Citation of Offense 18 USC 1349, 1344(2), 1028A(a)(1) e. Division in which the MAJORITY of events, acts, or omissions giving rise to the crime or crimes charged occurred: Western (Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura) [_] Eastern (Riverside and San Bernardino) [_] Southern (Orange) RELATED CASE Has an indictment or information involving this defendant and the same transaction or series of transactions been previously filed and dismissed before trial? No [_] Yes If "Yes," Case Number: Pursuant to General Order 21-01, criminal cases may be related if a previously filed indictment or information and the present case: a. arise out of the same conspiracy, common scheme, transaction, series of transactions or events; or b. involve one or more defendants in common, and would entail substantial duplication of labor in pretrial, trial or sentencing proceedings if heard by different judges. Related case(s), if any (MUST MATCH NOTICE OF RELATED CASE): PREVIOUSLY FILED COMPLAINT/CVB CITATION A complaint/CVB citation was previously filed on: 4/27/22 MJ 22-1656 Case Number: Assigned Judge: Hon. Gail J. Standish Charging: Wire fraud conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1349) The complaint/CVB citation: is still pending [_] was dismissed on: PREVIOUS COUNSEL Was defendant previously represented? No [_] Yes IF YES, provide Name: Phone Number: COMPLEX CASE Are there 8 or more defendants in the Indictment/Information? Yes* [_] No Will more than 12 days be required to present government's evidence in the case-in-chief? Yes* [_] No *AN ORIGINAL AND 1 COPY (UNLESS ELECTRONICALLY FILED) OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLEX CASE MUST BE FILED AT THE TIME THE INDICTMENT IS FILED IF EITHER "YES" BOX IS CHECKED. SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT/INFORMATION IS THIS ANEW DEFENDANT? [_] Yes [_] No superseding charge (i.e., 1st, 2nd). This is the The superseding case was previously filed on: Case Number The superseded case: [_] is still pending before Judge/Magistrate Judge L] was previously dismissed on Are there 8 or more defendants in the superseding case? [_] Yes* [_] No Will more than 12 days be required to present government's evidence in the case-in-chief? [_] Yes* [|] No Was a Notice of Complex Case filed on the Indictment or Information? [_] No [_] Yes *AN ORIGINAL AND 1 COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLEX CASE MUST BE FILED AT THE TIME THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT IS FILED IF EITHER "YES" BOX IS CHECKED. CR-72 (03/21) CASE SUMMARY Page 1 of 2 Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 32 Filed 05/12/22 Page 2of2 Page ID#:148 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE SUMMARY INTERPRETER Is an interpreter required? [_] YES NO IF YES, list language and/or dialect: CUSTODY STATUS OTHER [_] Male Female U.S. Citizen [_] Alien Alias Name(s) LG This defendant is charged in: [_] All counts Only counts: 1, 18, 29, 31,34 [_] This defendant is designated as "High Risk" per 18 USC § 3146(a)(2) by the U.S. Attorney. [_] This defendant is designated as "Special Case" per 18 USC § 3166(b)(7). [_] Yes No IF YES, should matter be sealed? [_] Yes No Is defendant a juvenile? The area(s) of substantive law that will be involved in this case include(s): financial institution fraud [_] public corruption government fraud [_] tax offenses mail/wire fraud [_] immigration offenses [_] environmental issues [_] narcotics offenses [_] violent crimes/firearms Other Identity theft [_] corporate fraud Defendant is not in custody: a. Date and time of arrest on complaint: b, Posted bond at complaint level on: in the amount of $ c.PSA supervision? [_] Yes [_]No d. Is on bail or release from another district: Defendant is in custody: a. Place of incarceration: [_] State [_] Federal b. Name of Institution: c. If Federal, U.S. Marshals Service Registration Number: d.[_] Solely on this charge. Date and time of arrest: e. On another conviction: [] Yes [_] No [_] Federal f. Awaiting trial on other charges: LE] Yes L] No IFYES: [] State [] Federal AND Name of Court: IFYES: [_] State [_] Writ of Issue Date transferred to federal custody: This person/proceeding is transferred from another district pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 20 21 40 EXCLUDABLE TIME Determinations as to excludable time prior to filing indictment/information. EXPLAIN: Date 05/09/2022 Zz Signature of Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory Bernstein Print Name CR-72 (03/21) CASE SUMMARY Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- 32.pdf
- Size
- 3,046,295 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5f4e37608370f1bea5e90f1316217c2c879238a56c9583785a55bbb955365ada
- Our copy
- 32.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.