Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order of Detention After Hearing — United States v. Natalie Le Demola (Document 222)

Order of Detention After Hearing — United States v. Natalie Le Demola (Document 222)

Summary

Order of Detention After Hearing (form CR-94) concerning Natalie Le Demola, Case No. 22-CR-00205-JFW, filed August 4, 2022 as Document 222. On motion of the Government, the form findings state that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance or the safety of any person or the community. As to flight risk it states that she was convicted of murder in state court and would have an incentive to flee. As to danger it states a prior criminal record involving violence and charged offenses involving significant monetary loss. It orders her detained before trial.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order of Detention After Hearing — United States v. Natalie Le Demola (Document 222).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-c-d-cal-no-2-22-cr-00205-dkt-222-c-d-cal-4809656713/, SHA-256 cf36b2f95407449e91c77f81028856c0252792c5a1665a823bd10fbe839b1b9f.

Full text

Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 222 Filed 08/04/22 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:663


                                                                             CLERK, U.S. DISTRICTCOURT


   1                                                                              AUG "'3~
   2                                                                      BYE'IVTRAL D
                                                                                     vISTRICT OF CALIFORNlq
                                                                                                    DEPUTY
   3

   4

   5

   6                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
   7                         CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
   8
       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
   9

  10                                   Plaintiff,        CASE NO.
  11                         v.                                         22-CR-00205-JFW
  12 NATALIE LE DEMOLA                                    ORDER OF DETENTION
  13

  14                                   Defendant.
  15

  16                                                      I.
  17        A.() On motion ofthe Government in a case allegedly involving:
  18             1.()     a crime of violence.
  19            2.()      an offense with maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death.
  20            3.()      a narcotics or controlled substance offense with maximum sentence
  21                      often or more years .
  22            4.()      any felony -where the defendant has been convicted oftwo or more
  23                      prior offenses described above.
  24            5.()      any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence that involves a
  25                      minor victim, or possession or use of a firearm or destructive device
  26                     or any other dangerous weapon, or a failure to register under 18
  27                     U.S.0 § 2250.
  28       B.(~        On motion by the Government /( )on Court's own motion, in a case

                                  ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING(18 U.S.C. §3142(1))

       CR-94 (06/07)                                                                                      PaBe 1 of4
Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 222 Filed 08/04/22 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:664




   1                     allegedly involving:
   2          (~         On the further allegation by the Government of:
   3            1. (~       a serious risk that the defendant will flee.
   4           2.()         a serious risk that the defendant will:
   5                  a.( )obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice.
   6                  b.( )threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror or
   7                        attempt to do so.
   8       C. The Government(~ is/()is not entitled to a rebuttable presumption that no
   9           condition or combination ofconditions will reasonably assure the defendant's
  10           appearance as required and the safety of any person or the community.
  11

  12                                                     II.
  13       A.(~          The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will
  14                     reasonably assure:
  15            1. (~       the appearance ofthe defendant as required.
  16              (~        and/or
  17           2. (~        the safety of any person or the community.
  18       B.(~          The Court finds that the defendant has not rebutted by sufficient
  19                     evidence to the contrary the presumption provided by statute.
  20

  21                                                     III.
  22       The Court has considered:
  23       A. the nature and circumstances ofthe offenses) charged, including whether the
  24           offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime ofterrorism, or involves a minor
  25           victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device;
  26       B. the weight of evidence against the defendant;
  27       C. the history and characteristics ofthe defendant; and
  28       D. the nature and seriousness ofthe danger to any person or to the community.

                                  ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING(18 U.S.C. §3142(1))

       CR-94(06/07)                                                                      Page 2 of ~
Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 222 Filed 08/04/22 Page 3 of 4 Page ID #:665




   1                                                     IV.
   2       The Court also has considered all the evidence adduced at the hearing and the
   3       arguments        and/or statements of counsel, and                     the     Pretrial   Services
   4       Report/recommendation.
   5

   6                                                      V.
   7       The Court bases the foregoing findings) on the following:
   8       A.(~          As to flight risk:
   9        Defendant was convicted of murder in state court and would have an incentive to flee.

  10

  11

  12

  13

  14

  15

  16       B.(~          As to danger:
  17        Defendant has a prior criminal record involving violence and the charged offenses involve
            significant monetary loss.
  18

  19

  20

  21

  22

  23

  24                                                     1~/
  25       A.()          The Court finds that a serious risk exists that the defendant will:
  26                  1.()obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice.
  27                  2.()attempt to/( )threaten, injure or intimidate a witness or juror.
  28

                                  ORDER OF DETENTION AFCER HEARING (18 U.S.C. §3142(1))

       CR-94(06/07)                                                                                    Page 3 of4
Case 2:22-cr-00205-JFW Document 222 Filed 08/04/22 Page 4 of 4 Page ID #:666




   1         B. The Court bases the foregoing findings) on the following:
   2

   3

   4

   5

   6

   7

   8

   9                                                    VII.
  10

  11 I       A. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained prior to trial.
  12         B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant be committed to the custody
  13              ofthe Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to
  14              the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being
  15              held in custody pending appeal.
  16         C. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant be afforded reasonable
  17              opportunity for private consultation with counsel.
  18         D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on order of a Court of the United States
  19              or on request of any attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the
  20              corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant
  21              to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection
  22              with a court proceeding.
  23

  24

  25

  26 DATED:              S    ~~                                       ~• 111
                                                               ED STATES MAGIST          TE JUDGE
  27

  28

                                 ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (18 U.S.C. §3142(1))

         CR-94 (06/07)                                                                       Page 4 of4 ~


File and source

File
222.pdf
Size
142,860 bytes
SHA-256
cf36b2f95407449e91c77f81028856c0252792c5a1665a823bd10fbe839b1b9f
Our copy
222.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top