Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — United States v. Tamara Dadyan (Ninth Circuit, No. 21-50297)

Order — United States v. Tamara Dadyan (Ninth Circuit, No. 21-50297)

Summary

In a January 27, 2022 order in United States v. Tamara Dadyan, No. 21-50297, Ninth Circuit Judges Christen and Nguyen denied the appellant's motion for bail pending appeal because the appellant has not shown that the appeal raises a “substantial question” of law or fact that is “fairly debatable” (18 U.S.C. § 3143(b)). The order also granted the appellee's unopposed motion to file exhibits under seal, directing the Clerk to file Docket Entry No. 9-1 publicly and keep Docket Entry No. 9-2 under seal, and left the briefing schedule in effect.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — United States v. Tamara Dadyan (Ninth Circuit, No. 21-50297).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-c-d-cal-no-2-20-cr-00579-dkt-1270-c-d-cal-8253521544/, SHA-256 f44e4637e2a5acd273c1081ef06c3e6a59f8d56bb77fd2f14ee91fc597ce03a3.

Full text

Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 1270 Filed 01/27/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:19779




                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         FILED
                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                            JAN 27 2022
                                                                       MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.   21-50297

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No.
                                                 2:20-cr-00579-SVW-4
   v.                                            Central District of California,
                                                 Los Angeles
 TAMARA DADYAN,
                                                 ORDER
                 Defendant-Appellant.

 Before: CHRISTEN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

        Appellant’s motion for bail pending appeal (Docket Entry No. 4) is denied.

 Appellant has not shown that the appeal raises a “substantial question” of law or

 fact that is “fairly debatable.” United States v. Handy, 761 F.2d 1279, 1283 (9th

 Cir. 1985); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b).

        Appellee’s unopposed motion to file exhibits under seal (Docket Entry No.

 9) is granted. The Clerk will publicly file Docket Entry No. 9-1 and maintain

 Docket Entry No. 9-2 under seal.

        The briefing schedule established previously remains in effect.




 KWH/MOATT

File and source

File
1270.pdf
Size
84,421 bytes
SHA-256
f44e4637e2a5acd273c1081ef06c3e6a59f8d56bb77fd2f14ee91fc597ce03a3
Our copy
1270.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top