Government’s Supplemental Brief in Opposition — United States v. Fontrell Antonio Baines (No. 2:20-cr-00522)
Summary
Government's Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Application for Reconsideration of Release Due to Changed Circumstances, Document 34, Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF, filed 01/13/21, with a stated hearing date of Jan. 14, 2021. It states that the brief addresses an issue raised by the Court at the hearing on January 7, 2021: whether the defendant can review discovery while subject to quarantine procedures at the Metropolitan Detention Center. It states that the discovery is subject to a Protective Order barring the defendant from possessing it outside the presence of counsel. The government proposes giving the defendant a redacted copy during the quarantine, to be returned afterward. The brief is signed /s/ Ranee A. Katzenstein and dated January 13, 2021.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Government’s Supplemental Brief in Opposition — United States v. Fontrell Antonio Baines (No. 2:20-cr-00522).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-c-d-cal-no-2-20-cr-00522-dkt-34-c-d-cal-0f04d473a2/
, SHA-256 8f366a2f4b1be2e122057a1eec2fe752de646794d3c9850c93b1b3fb19fe8761.Full text
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 34 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:197
1 TRACY L. WILKISON
Acting United States Attorney
2 BRANDON D. FOX
Assistant United States Attorney
3 Chief, Criminal Division
RANEE A. KATZENSTEIN (Cal. Bar No. 187111)
4 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Major Frauds Section
5 1100 United States Courthouse
312 North Spring Street
6 Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-2432
7 Facsimile: (213) 894-6269
E-mail: ranee.katzenstein@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. CR 20-522-MWF(AFM)
13 Plaintiff, GOVERNMENT’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
14 v. APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
RELEASE DUE TO CHANGED
15 FONTRELL ANTONIO BAINES, CIRCUMSTANCES
16 Defendant. Hearing Date: Jan. 14, 2021
Hearing Time: 1:30 p.m.
17
18 Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel
19 of record, the Acting United States Attorney for the Central District
20 of California and Assistant United States Attorney Ranee A.
21 Katzenstein, hereby files this supplemental brief in opposition to
22 defendant’s application for reconsideration of release due to changed
23 circumstances. (Dkt. 25.) This brief addresses the issue raised by
24 the Court at the hearing on January 7, 2021, namely, whether
25 defendant can review the discovery in this case in order to prepare
26 for trial while he is subject to the quarantine procedures instituted
27 by the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to address the COVID-19
28 pandemic. The issue arises because the discovery is subject to a
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 34 Filed 01/13/21 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:198
1 Protective Order that prohibits defendant from possessing the
2 discovery outside the presence of his counsel in order to protect the
3 unredacted personal identifying information (PII) of third parties
4 that the discovery contains. Defendant is unable to meet with his
5 counsel while the quarantine persists at MDC and, thus, is currently
6 unable to review the discovery.
7 As discussed below, the government proposes to reconcile the
8 need to protect the PII – which is the purpose of the Protective
9 Order – with defendant’s need to prepare for trial by providing
10 defendant with a copy of the discovery in which the PII is redacted.
11 The government will seek an amendment to the protective order to
12 allow defendant to review this redacted discovery outside the
13 presence of his counsel during any period in which quarantine
14 procedures prevent him from being able to meet with his counsel.
15 I. The Discovery Produced in this Case and the Protective Order
16 The discovery produced by the government in this case comprises
17 2715 pages of records. The records fall into the following
18 categories:
19 • Applications for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits
20 submitted to the California Employment Development Department
21 (EDD) (approximately 438 pages);
22 • Identification records for the debit cards administered by
23 Bank of America by which EDD disburses the UI benefits (BofA
24 Debit Cards) (approximately 591 pages);
25 • Transaction records for the BofA Debit Cards (approximately
26 423 pages);
27
28
2
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 34 Filed 01/13/21 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:199
1 • ATM photos showing the BofA Debit Cards being used
2 (approximately 491 pages);
3 • BofA Debit Card account spreadsheets (approximately 120
4 pages);
5 • YouTube, Instagram and other provider screen shots
6 (approximately 476 pages);
7 • Defendant’s Bureau of Prisons health records (approximately
8 129 pages);
9 • Reports of interviews (approximately 24 pages); and
10 • Store receipts and surveillance regarding use of the BofA
11 Debit Cards (approximately 11 pages).
12 The remainder of the records include spreadsheets and other
13 information from EDD, subscriber information from Internet Service
14 Providers, records from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department,
15 and the arrest warrant and other filings in this case.
16 On November 20, 2020, an order was entered in this case to
17 protect the PII contained in the discovery from unnecessary
18 dissemination and/or misuse. (Dkt. 22.) The Protective Order
19 provides, among other things, that “defendant may review PII
20 Materials only in the presence of a member of the Defense Team, who
21 shall ensure that defendant is never left alone with any PII
22 Materials.”
23 The PII in the discovery is primarily found in the applications
24 for UI benefits, the identification records for the BofA Debit Cards,
25 and the reports of interview. Although there are account numbers in
26 the transaction records for the BofA Debit Cards, these accounts have
27
28
3
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 34 Filed 01/13/21 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:200
1 been closed and, therefore, the potential for misuse of this
2 information is minimal.
3 II. Trial
4 Trial is currently set for February 23, 2021. The government
5 believes that this date will be continued because of the suspension
6 of certain court functions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. See
7 “Notice from the Clerk: Extension of Continuity of Operations Plan”
8 (Jan. 6, 2021), available at
9 http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2021-01-
10 06%20Notice%20-%20Extension%20of%20COOP%20Plan.pdf Given the
11 continuing suspension of all jury trials under the COOP Plan; the
12 closure of court facilities to the public, except for hearings on
13 certain criminal duty matters, until at least January 29, 2021; the
14 continuing increase in the number of COVID-19 cases,
15 hospitalizations, and test positivity rates in this district, and the
16 time needed to summons jurors for trial once the court facilities
17 reopen, it is unlikely that trial in this matter can commence before
18 April 1, 2021.
19 III. Conditions at MDC
20 On October 16, 2020, this Court found that no condition or
21 combination of conditions would reasonably assure the appearance of
22 defendant as required or the safety of the community and ordered
23 defendant detained. (Dkt. 6.) On November 16, 2020, MDC, where
24 defendant is being held, instituted quarantine procedures to address
25 an outbreak of COVID-19. MDC currently has 12 active cases (down
26 from the 99 reported at the beginning of the outbreak), one inmate
27 death, and 326 inmates recovered. BOP, COVID-19 Coronavirus (updated
28
4
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 34 Filed 01/13/21 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:201
1 daily at 12pm Pacific), available at
2 https://www.bop.gov/coronavirus/index.jsp (last visited Jan. 13,
3 2021). Although the outbreak is being brought under control,
4 defendant is still subject to quarantine procedures that preclude
5 meeting with his counsel in person or by VTC. According to MDC
6 Attorney Advisor JoAnna Wilson, although defendant’s housing unit is
7 still considered “exposed quarantine,” testing is expected in the
8 next few days and it is hoped that the unit will convert to
9 “recovered” next week.
10 IV. Government’s Proposal to Enable Defendant to Have Access to the
Discovery in Order to Prepare for Trial
11
In order to reconcile the need to protect the PII in the
12
discovery and defendant’s need to prepare for trial, the government
13
proposes the following:
14
The government will prepare a set of the discovery in which the
15
PII is redacted. This redacted set will be prepared in phases. The
16
first phase will include the UI benefits applications, reports of
17
interviews, and debit card identification records (approximately 1050
18
pages). The second phase of redactions will include the debit card
19
transactions and spreadsheet records (approximately 543 pages) plus
20
spot-checking of the remaining discovery to ensure that no PII is
21
included. The government believes it can complete Phase I by January
22
22, 2021, and Phase II by January 29, 2021.
23
The government will also seek entry of a proposed supplement to
24
the Protective Order addressing procedures to enable defendant to
25
have access to this redacted discovery while MDC continues to
26
implement quarantine measures to deal with COVID-19. The proposed
27
procedures will allow defendant to possess the redacted discovery
28
5
Case 2:20-cr-00522-MWF Document 34 Filed 01/13/21 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:202
1 while the quarantine remains in effect, but require him to return it
2 once the quarantine is lifted and he is able to meet with counsel to
3 review the unredacted discovery. Returning the unredacted discovery
4 when access to it is no longer necessary is appropriate because, for
5 ease of understanding, the redacted discovery will still include the
6 claimants’ names and portions of their PII, i.e., the last four
7 digits of their SSN, the year of birth, the city and state of
8 residence, the last four digits of phone numbers and the last four
9 digits of driver’s licenses.
10 Counsel for defendant was informed of this proposal and asked
11 for defendant’s position regarding it and any objections to it. As
12 of the filing of this supplemental brief, counsel for defendant has
13 not stated a position regarding this proposal.
14
15 Dated: January 13, 2021 Respectfully submitted,
16 TRACY L. WILKISON
Acting United States Attorney
17
BRANDON D. FOX
18 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
19
20 /s/ Ranee A. Katzenstein
RANEE A. KATZENSTEIN
21 Assistant United States Attorney
22 Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
File and source
- File
- 34.pdf
- Size
- 44,266 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8f366a2f4b1be2e122057a1eec2fe752de646794d3c9850c93b1b3fb19fe8761
- Our copy
- 34.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.